George Levy writes:
>Russell Standish is as infinite as the continuum, and in
> fact there is a path along the Russell Standish continuum that eventually
> becomes George Levy.
Russell Standish Responds
>No - I don't believe this is true in the MWI of Quantum Mechanics. It
>may be true of the
"Jacques M. Mallah" wrote:
>
> > relative SSA predicts that the observer will see at the next instant
> > of time an observer moment with the greatest measure, subject to its
> > lying in the future of the current observer moment. That measure may
> > be fantastically small (eg just prior to a
On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Russell Standish wrote:
> > I use the terms SSA, ASSA, RSSA only because others on the list
> > insist on using them. In my opinion the 'ASSA' is a tautology and not
> > an assumption, while the 'RSSA' is an error.
>
> ASSA SSA. ASSA makes explicit the sample set over w
<<
George Levy writes
>
> This said, I find it difficult to talk about increase and decrease and
making
> comparisons of the measure when the quantity in question is infinite.
>
> Measure is not finite. This would violate the principle of plenitude and
it
> would require a reason fo
I use the terms SSA, ASSA, RSSA only because others on the list
insist on using them. In my opinion the 'ASSA' is a tautology and not
an assumption, while the 'RSSA' is an error.
On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Russell Standish wrote:
> Now this implies that an individual's measure decreases the o
On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Jacques M. Mallah wrote:
> Life will continue but with decreasing measure. Still it seems
> that you can make a refutable prediction: namely, that the universe we are
> in is not optimised for us to be here, but is optimised to give you a long
> lifetime. Basically you
Jacques Mallah wrote:
> No, I'm just a sane MWIer. I have explained my views on this on
>previous occasions.
> According to the standard MWI, the measure of a human is
>proprtional to the squared amplitude of the term in the wavefunction which
>that human is in. As long as there is
>
> On 18 xxx -1, Marchal wrote:
> > Jacques M. Mallah wrote:
> > >> Russell Standish wrote:
> > >> I still don't see what measure has to do with conciousness!
> > > That is the problem.
> > I don't see that either.
> > The measure is defined on the set of computations and gives the
> > relati
On 18 xxx -1, Marchal wrote:
> Jacques M. Mallah wrote:
> >> Russell Standish wrote:
> >> I still don't see what measure has to do with conciousness!
> > That is the problem.
> I don't see that either.
> The measure is defined on the set of computations and gives the
> relative probability of
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Russell Standish wrote:
[Jack wrote]
> > What I am trying to do is to look at the consequences of the
> > claims made by the quantum suicide camp. The claim is that consciousness
> > 'flows into' possible continuations of oneself and is, in effect,
> > conserved as long a
10 matches
Mail list logo
