On 24 Sep, 06:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 23, 10:39 pm, Youness Ayaita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There have always been two ways to interpret the interrelationship
between the physical world and our minds.
There's a lot more than two ways.
The first one is to consider
the
Thank you for your opinions and conceptual clarifications. I'll answer
separately.
Russell:
On 24 Sep., 01:36, Russell Standish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Successor observer moments are meant to be similar to their prior
OMs. By similar, I really mean differ by a single bit, but don't hold
me
Youness Ayaita writes:
It's a very trivial fact though that the two approaches are not
equivalent. Nonetheless it's interesting to note it. I argue that we
have good reasons to discard the second approach. The fundamental role
will be assigned to the physical worlds (hence the title of this
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 09:52:12AM -0700, Youness Ayaita wrote:
I really enjoyed reading your paper Why Occam's Razor? and I'd never
pretend to understand your derivation of quantum mechanics better than
you do. But maybe, I have another perspective on it (or even an
addition). Explaining
Further ruminations on Born's rule: I will
take the presentation in appendix D of Theory of Nothing, as it is
slightly more up to date than in Why Occam's razor, and the
relationship of measure to the magnitude of the quantum state is more explicit.
The interesting thing to note about the
There have always been two ways to interpret the interrelationship
between the physical world and our minds. The first one is to consider
the physical world to be fundamental; from this perspective, the
appearance of the mind is to be understood with the help of some
neurological theory that maps
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 03:39:16AM -0700, Youness Ayaita wrote:
... Two approaches are physics is real (realism), and physics emerges
(idealism)
It's a very trivial fact though that the two approaches are not
equivalent. Nonetheless it's interesting to note it. I argue that we
have good
On Sep 23, 10:39 pm, Youness Ayaita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There have always been two ways to interpret the interrelationship
between the physical world and our minds.
There's a lot more than two ways.
The first one is to consider
the physical world to be fundamental; from this
8 matches
Mail list logo
