Re: Unprovable Physical Truths and Unwinnable Arguments

2006-03-06 Thread Norman Samish
ing must exist is 'Because.' "   I have to admit that this seems as valid a reason as any other I've heard.   Norman - Original Message - From: "John M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <everything-list@googlegroups.com> Sent: Mond

Re: Unprovable Physical Truths and Unwinnable Arguments

2006-03-06 Thread John M
George: Thanks for this delightful story (..ies?) I met Chaitin once for a brief chat and did not like him: he was too sharp for me (though very friendly). His quoted idea is something I will keep to use it against closed-minded physicists (or provide it to open-minded wifes of them). John

Unprovable Physical Truths and Unwinnable Arguments

2006-03-05 Thread George Levy
There is a great article entitled "The Limts of Reason" by Gregory Chaitin in the March Issue of  Scientific American page 74. I quote:  "So perhaps mathematicians should not try to prove everything. Sometimes they should try to add new axioms. That is what you have got to do when you are faced