GLevy wrote:
[...]
I am fascinated by antiterrorism methods that expose the inconsistency
of terrorists. The problem is that that no matter what rational argument
you could come up with, they will find a way to rationalize their
position. It may be that the root of the problem is emotional and
Hi Charles
Sorry, I am not responsible for these statements. I was only quoting
Bruno Marchal's post or 09/19. However, I agree with Bruno very much. It
seems that as in mathematics, any (religious) belief anchored by a rigid
credo (set of axioms) is bound to be either incomplete or
-Original Message-
From: George Levy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 21 September 2001 8:18 a.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Who is the enemy?
I just say this because I consider real atheist as very religious
people, and, what is worth is that most of the time
Hi John,
You wrote (out-of-line)
Bruno FYI here is a private message I submitted today including a copy of
part of a post to a complexity-list yesterday.
(No restriction in using any of it anywhere)
John Mikes (jamikes).
Thanks for your courageous post where you
Marchal wrote:
George Levy wrote
This paradox can easily be solved by falling back on a relativistic
approach. Each observer has his/her own frame of reference. All
perceptions are relative to the observer. Period. After all, Einstein's
Relativity does not use first person and third
George Levy wrote
[...]
I guess I was talking mostly about the fanatics and the misled people.
One could also argue that these people do not have a rigorous scientific
upbringing and are very much driven by their emotions.
Therefore, they
may be classified as illogical.
I think emotion are
Marchal wrote:
George Levy wrote
This paradox can easily be solved by falling back on a relativistic
approach. Each observer has his/her own frame of reference. All
perceptions are relative to the observer. Period. After all, Einstein's
Relativity does not use first person and third
Who is the enemy?
What is moral? What is not moral?
What is morality in the context of the MWI?
Is Quantum Suicide moral?
Let me propose a conjecture and let us see how far we can go with it:
Morality is the creation, protection and preservation of information.
Immorality is the destruction
Saibal Mitra wrote:
Bruno, what did you expect? You should expect Jacques to be a typical
American.
The everything list is not a random sample. Unfortunately!
Because frankly I appreciate the Americans here.
I find them very sympa.
You know how Americans on opposite sides of an issue
with the destruction
caused in NYC by the advocates of suicide and believers in immortality.
I understand your concern with NYC. I share with you the concern
of those terrible and crual 11 sept. events.
Now a pecularity of this war consists in figuring out who
is the enemy, exactly.
It looks
is behaving in a way you
should expect from the MWI or your theory.
Saibal
- Original Message -
From: Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 6:08 PM
Subject: Who is the enemy?
Jacques Mallah wrote:
(I'm currently in North Dakota, but have
in NYC by the advocates of suicide and believers in immortality.
I understand your concern with NYC. I share with you the concern
of those terrible and crual 11 sept. events.
Now a pecularity of this war consists in figuring out who
is the enemy, exactly.
It looks like you have solved that problem
more concerned with the destruction
caused in NYC by the advocates of suicide and believers in immortality.
I understand your concern with NYC. I share with you the concern
of those terrible and crual 11 sept. events.
Now a pecularity of this war consists in figuring out who
is the enemy
13 matches
Mail list logo
