Re: has anyone ever proposed a version of the anthropic principle

2005-05-26 Thread danny mayes
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "danny mayes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 6:20 PM Subject: Re: has anyone ever proposed a version of the anthropic principle Sounds to me what Tipler was arguing in "Physics of Immortality". Whilst the "Omega Point

Re: has anyone ever proposed a version of the anthropic principle

2005-05-26 Thread Stephen Paul King
use their knowledge to build theories to give themselves some hope of an "afterlife". Stephen - Original Message - From: "Russell Standish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "danny mayes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 6:20 PM Subje

Re: has anyone ever proposed a version of the anthropic principle

2005-05-26 Thread Russell Standish
Sounds to me what Tipler was arguing in "Physics of Immortality". Whilst the "Omega Point Theory" developed in that book is interesting and fun, most of the rest of the book is rubbish. Cheers On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 10:35:03PM -0400, danny mayes wrote: > to the effect that not only must the uni

has anyone ever proposed a version of the anthropic principle

2005-05-24 Thread danny mayes
to the effect that not only must the universe allow for intelligent observers, specifically us, but that the universe must allow for intelligent observers to be able to recreate or emulate their existence? Maybe a stronger version would be to recreate or emulate infinitely. I am aware of the f