=20
1) When users search the global address list, the results are
successful, but a pop-up error message appears did not complete
successfully. I have no idea why this is so and my research has come
to a dead-end.
I guess this happens when the LDAP search also returns a search
reference,
You mean to say, the address fields like city, state etc are not
shown in respective fields in the editor?
That is because LDAP server returns the LDAP address filed
in just a delimiter separated string, with which we
can not extract any information. So everything is shown in the
address field.
Hello,
IMHO Evolution is a good Client but one this i find not very useful:
Why does Evolution save the Adress fields in ldap not separated ?
When accessing the ldap with various clients it is better to save the
fields
separated. Is it possible to change this ?
And where did Evolution save
Hi,
I was wondering, what objectClass does evolution supports in a LDAP
contact list? Can I choose the objectClass to search?
Thanks for any help.
--
Paulo Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eurotux Informática, SA
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Does ldpsearch tol return anything when you try with same filter
( (objectclass=person)
(|(cn=jan*)(sn=jan*)) ) (expecting max 100 results)
Make sure you selected right scope also, try with sub to be sure.
Siva
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 11:40 +0100, Moussa Razzouki wrote:
Hi,
Using evolution 2
Hi,
ldap search from contacts is working o.k.
But it doesn't autocomplete when writing mail.
Within the preferences, autocompletion for this ldap server is
checked. I have to say, it did work twice but sporadically.
Can't reproduce this either.
Also, I had 3 accounts setup with a previous
Hi,
I have the following setup:
Fedora Core 3
evolution-connector-2.0.2-1
evolution-data-server-1.0.2-3
evolution-webcal-1.0.10-1
evolution-2.0.2-3
When using the address book search window, sending queries to an
exchange global address list, the results only come back as last
names. This
Hi Jan,
now I'm using the authenticated access specifying in the LDAP Properties
Use Secure connection: never and it's working. Before I was using
anonymous access.
Regards,
-rochi
On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 15:56 +0100, Jan Mynarik wrote:
Hi,
it looks like you have a similar problem to one I
Hi,
it looks like you have a similar problem to one I had. See thread
starting with
http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/evolution/2004-October/040073.html
I had the same problem but with the server certificate (signed by own
certificate authority). You seem to have problem with client
Hi all,
I'm trying to connect my Evolution 2.0.2 client to an LDAP (OpenLDAP)
directory.
When I try to connect I get an error popup with the following text:
Error loading addressbook.
We were unable to open this addressbook. This either means you have
entered an incorrect URI, or the LDAP
Hello,
I have an ldap server with people entries in
uid=me,ou=People,dn=mydomain,dc=net
and Evolution can't see them. Is there any way to make evolution
searching contacts in ldap spécial subtree ?
Thanks
François
--
Debian SID
Linux tanna 2.6.8.1 #1 Tue Sep
Sorry, it's working today :-|
But Evolution crashed when changing the limit of contact to display in
the ldap server properties.
François
Le ven 24/09/2004 à 08:37, François Chenais a écrit :
Hello,
I have an ldap server with people entries in
Hello,
Im using evolution 1.5.94.1 on Mandrake 10.1beta. Ive setup an openldap
server and im trying to connect my evolution client to it. I have the
settings correct and I can browse the ldap server with the java
'ldapbrowser' application.
When I give evolution the same ldap
After I upgraded to evolution 1.4.5 I noticed that connectivity to my
LDAP address book ceased to function.
In the process of troubleshooting I tried searching the LDAP service via
command line tools (ldapsearch and friends) and that works just ducky.
However when it try and open it via
Hi.
I'm having some difficulty using my openldap store with evo 1.5.8 under
debian unstable. I've included the evolutionperson.schema back in 1.4
days, and my contacts work fine - for single contacts. Now, under 1.5.8,
the work and home addresses I stored for contacts appear in the card
view but
Actually it sounds more likely to be a code bug (although the contacts coders might disagree).
I would check the 1.5 bugs on bugzilla, there are plenty of ldap related ones. http://bugzilla.ximian.com/evo-report15.cgi
On Fri, 2004-06-04 at 00:09 +0100, Eamonn Hamilton wrote:
Hi.
I'm
hello,
I am importing a 300+ vcf file, containing a lot of vcards.
the evolution process seems to run well, however no card is imported.
-- how can I debug this?
I tried runnning /usr/lib/evolution/1.4/evolution-vcard-importer as
command-line, however nothing got imported.
any idea?
thanks,
Le mer 12/05/2004 à 16:20, Stan Pinte a écrit :
hello,
I am importing a 300+ vcf file, containing a lot of vcards.
the evolution process seems to run well, however no card is imported.
-- how can I debug this?
more info:
the first two contacts (I just tried two) are properly imported.
No, 389 is the port. Link below kind of touches on the topic (google is
your friend)
http://is-it-true.org/nt/nt2000/atips/atips84.shtml
Are you getting authentication to work? ie. it prompts for password once
without stating that it is using anonymous.
On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 09:38, Edward
Horray!
Figured it out. What the issue was is that AD does not allow you to view
objects that are nested in folders (pardon the technical term). What
was happening is that he account was searching and returning results
from the higher level without searching the 'subfolders'. Changing
Ok. I may be makeing some progress here. Once I fixed a few clarical
errors I can now use my email in conjunction with the setting being
Distinguished Name and I get prompted for password. Once supplied it
stoped asking. I then did some searching and came across the posting
about the display of
On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 11:17 -0700, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 13:57 -0400, Chris Gow wrote:
I've setup an LDAP server which is working fine for searches (either in
the address book or the mailer). But whenever I go into the contacts
section and look at contacts from
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 14:17 -0400, Chris Gow wrote:
On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 11:17 -0700, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 13:57 -0400, Chris Gow wrote:
I've setup an LDAP server which is working fine for searches (either in
the address book or the mailer). But whenever I go
Just broke down and purchased Ximian Evolution (on faith that it will do
all I need) as I have grown tiard of WINE fun.
Trying to get LDAP lookup to work. Corp is Exchange 2000 mixed mode.
Structure is [EMAIL PROTECTED] for email with the old account
type being [EMAIL PROTECTED] (due to corp
On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 09:17 -0400, Wise, Jeremey wrote:
Mail works.. no name lookup so I figured I needed to add an LDAP server.
Put in LDAP.pios.com for server with name being CN=wisej,DC=pios,DC=com
and it displays several 'support base' options.
The username definition must be wrong
Hello:
I decided last night to take the plunge and move to 1.5.7 (too many
discussions on 1.5 not to). So far I haven't noticed any major issues. But
I am still having issues with LDAP and contacts.
I've setup an LDAP server which is working fine for searches (either in
the address book or the
man, 26.04.2004 kl. 19.29 skrev Chris Toshok:
Even tried to modify slapd.conf to
access * by * write
as the only rule just to check the it's not because of badly configured
ACL. But no change :(
GQ
Error modifying entry 'cn=...': Naming violation
Additional
Hmm, thats strange, but with GQ-1.0b1 I'm getting the same results
- can change anything in the contacts except CN - will produce the same
error like Evo.
Looks to me like there is problem in Openldap or Evo and GQ share the
same bug. Is someone else running Openldap 2.1.22 experiencing this
man, 26.04.2004 kl. 09.49 skrev David Kmoch:
Hmm, thats strange, but with GQ-1.0b1 I'm getting the same results
- can change anything in the contacts except CN - will produce the same
error like Evo.
Looks to me like there is problem in Openldap or Evo and GQ share the
same bug. Is
V Po, 26. 04. 2004 v 13:12, Tony Earnshaw pe:
man, 26.04.2004 kl. 09.49 skrev David Kmoch:
Hmm, thats strange, but with GQ-1.0b1 I'm getting the same results
- can change anything in the contacts except CN - will produce the same
error like Evo.
Looks to me like there is problem in
On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 17:07 +0200, David Kmoch wrote:
V Po, 26. 04. 2004 v 13:12, Tony Earnshaw pe:
man, 26.04.2004 kl. 09.49 skrev David Kmoch:
Hmm, thats strange, but with GQ-1.0b1 I'm getting the same results
- can change anything in the contacts except CN - will produce the same
On Sat, 2004-04-24 at 21:57 -0700, Chris Toshok wrote:
Are you updating the cn of the entry? There's been some talk of that
failing (and it does for me too, without some recent changes in my
source tree) with openldap 2.1+.
Will the next 1.5 release integrate those changes ?
--
Joaquim
Dunno if it'll make the next snapshot. My solution turns out to have
problems of its own. It's not an easy problem to fix.
Chris
On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 11:26 +0200, Joaquim Fellmann wrote:
On Sat, 2004-04-24 at 21:57 -0700, Chris Toshok wrote:
Are you updating the cn of the entry? There's
fre, 23.04.2004 kl. 00.56 skrev Lonnie Borntreger:
I wasn't able to get authenticated access to my LDAP server until I
switched to 1.5 (.3 is when I switched - I think). Now I'm running
1.5.7 (CVS as of yesterday).. let me check now it DID allow
me to edit an entry, but when
ons, 21.04.2004 kl. 12.13 skrev Wouter de Vries:
What are the benefits of installing the evolutionperson schema into
openldap?
I added it to my ldap server and manually inserted a vcard with a
birthday, which shows up fine in evolution, but it is not editable.
Could I be using an old
lør, 24.04.2004 kl. 00.36 skrev Chris Toshok:
It's a problem in evolution because we don't give cn another value - we
replace the current one. Therefore the rdn is no longer in the entry.
Thanks for pointing that out. For the record, my remark applied to the
attribute in general, not to its
tor, 22.04.2004 kl. 23.31 skrev Ron Johnson:
What are the benefits of installing the evolutionperson schema into
openldap?
I added it to my ldap server and manually inserted a vcard with a
birthday, which shows up fine in evolution, but it is not editable.
Could I be using an old
Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
I wasn't able to get authenticated access to my LDAP server until I
switched to 1.5 (.3 is when I switched - I think).
authenticated fine using 1.4.6-2 on debian...just make sure you select
never for using TLS...
Stan.
Now I'm running
1.5.7 (CVS as of
Le ven 23/04/2004 à 00:56, Lonnie Borntreger a écrit :
I wasn't able to get authenticated access to my LDAP server until I
switched to 1.5 (.3 is when I switched - I think). Now I'm running
1.5.7 (CVS as of yesterday).. let me check now it DID allow
me to edit an entry, but when
On Sat, 2004-04-24 at 12:36 +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
Le ven 23/04/2004 à 00:56, Lonnie Borntreger a écrit :
I wasn't able to get authenticated access to my LDAP server until I
switched to 1.5 (.3 is when I switched - I think). Now I'm running
1.5.7 (CVS as of yesterday).. let me
On Sat, 2004-04-24 at 09:08 +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
fre, 23.04.2004 kl. 00.56 skrev Lonnie Borntreger:
I wasn't able to get authenticated access to my LDAP server until I
switched to 1.5 (.3 is when I switched - I think). Now I'm running
1.5.7 (CVS as of yesterday).. let me
lør, 24.04.2004 kl. 15.57 skrev Lonnie Borntreger:
You might like to do a 'tail -f' on the slapd log at the same time as
you're doing your Evo stuff - it'll more than likely tell you how, what
and why. FWIW I have no trouble in adding or editing records, but I bind
as a privileged user
lør, 24.04.2004 kl. 11.53 skrev Stan Pinte:
I wasn't able to get authenticated access to my LDAP server until I
switched to 1.5 (.3 is when I switched - I think).
authenticated fine using 1.4.6-2 on debian...just make sure you select
never for using TLS...
1.4.5 on RedHat RHEL3 (o.k.,
On Sat, 2004-04-24 at 06:57 -0700, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
On Sat, 2004-04-24 at 09:08 +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
fre, 23.04.2004 kl. 00.56 skrev Lonnie Borntreger:
I wasn't able to get authenticated access to my LDAP server until I
switched to 1.5 (.3 is when I switched - I think).
Hi,
searching through history of this list I've found mail from Tony
Earnshaw giving some example on subject. Looking at snippet bellow
I just wonder if it's legal to have different 'cn' value in
distinguishedName and in 'cn' entity?
Why I'm asking - with my Evo 1.4.5 + OpenLDAP 2.1.22 config I
I took a little time tonight and got ldap_rename/ldap_modrdn support
working in the 1.5.x code. I haven't committed it since the change in
uid's screws up the front end as well and that'll have to be addressed.
Right now you pretty much have to requery after changing the naming
attribute in order
fre, 23.04.2004 kl. 11.43 skrev Adam Tauno Williams:
searching through history of this list I've found mail from Tony
Earnshaw giving some example on subject. Looking at snippet bellow
I just wonder if it's legal to have different 'cn' value in
distinguishedName and in 'cn' entity?
It's a problem in evolution because we don't give cn another value - we
replace the current one. Therefore the rdn is no longer in the entry.
Chris
On Sat, 2004-04-24 at 00:26 +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
fre, 23.04.2004 kl. 11.43 skrev Adam Tauno Williams:
searching through history of
Searching through history of this list I've found mail from Tony
Earnshaw giving some example on subject. I just wonder if it's
legal to have different 'cn' value in distinguishedName and in 'cn'
entity?
Why I'm asking - with my Evo 1.4.5 + OpenLDAP 2.1.22 config I
find it impossible to implement
V t, 22. 04. 2004 v 14:07, Michael Braun pe:
Hi,
when I search a contact in my LDAP directory I find the contact which I'm
searching for. But when I open the contact book in the new mail window and
search there for the same contact I do not find this contact. Is it possible
that there
Hi,
What are the benefits of installing the evolutionperson schema into
openldap?
I added it to my ldap server and manually inserted a vcard with a
birthday, which shows up fine in evolution, but it is not editable.
Could I be using an old evolutionperson schema or is the use of the
schema
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 12:13 +0200, Wouter de Vries wrote:
Hi,
What are the benefits of installing the evolutionperson schema into
openldap?
I added it to my ldap server and manually inserted a vcard with a
birthday, which shows up fine in evolution, but it is not editable.
Could I be
Well now it seems things are mucked up a bit. We migrated from Exchange
5.5 to Exchange 2003. For those of us who use Evolution and various
other clients other than Outlook, we have lost LDAP connection to the
server. I have tried to find where to set up LDAP on 2003, but to no
avail. I saw a
which version of evolution?
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 13:28 -0700, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 12:13 +0200, Wouter de Vries wrote:
Hi,
What are the benefits of installing the evolutionperson schema into
openldap?
I added it to my ldap server and manually inserted a
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 12:13 +0200, Wouter de Vries wrote:
Hi,
What are the benefits of installing the evolutionperson schema into
openldap?
I added it to my ldap server and manually inserted a vcard with a
birthday, which shows up fine in evolution, but it is not editable.
Could I be
I wasn't able to get authenticated access to my LDAP server until I
switched to 1.5 (.3 is when I switched - I think). Now I'm running
1.5.7 (CVS as of yesterday).. let me check now it DID allow
me to edit an entry, but when trying to save the changes it said the
addressbook backend
tor, 22.04.2004 kl. 14.07 skrev Michael Braun:
when I search a contact in my LDAP directory I find the contact which I'm
searching for. But when I open the contact book in the new mail window and
search there for the same contact I do not find this contact. Is it possible
that there are
[Send for Steven Zhang. His mail box encounts some problem.]
Folks,
I met some problem in using Evolution 1.4.5 under redhat.
When I start evolution, and try to search contact in LDAP, I found EVO
provides the following LDAP search features:
1, search by name
2, search by email
3, search by
Anybody can help me here?
I am using Evo 1.4.5 in Red Hat now. But met some problem about ldap
search.
1, what is the meaning of category in ldap search, how to use the
category in search?
2, if I wanna to create a expression, such like phonenumber=800*, how
can I create such expressions?
tor, 08.04.2004 kl. 07.26 skrev Steven Zhang:
I am using Evo 1.4.5 in Red Hat now. But met some problem about ldap
search.
1, what is the meaning of category in ldap search, how to use the
category in search?
Click on Categories in the new card window (File - New - Contact).
It's a
tir, 17.02.2004 kl. 08.52 skrev Bjørn T Johansen:
Is there any way to configure which fields Evolution is using to save a
contact to a ldap server? if I for instance want to change the schema?
No :)
--Tonni
--
mail: billy - at - billy.demon.nl
http://www.billy.demon.nl
Is there any way to configure which fields Evolution is using to save a
contact to a ldap server? if I for instance want to change the schema?
Regards,
BTJ
___
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
forward to the changes sketched by
Michael below ...
Ciao
Frank
Original Message
Subject: evolution / LDAP / Exchange / Groupwise integration ...
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 15:38:13 +
From: Michael Meeks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Ximian.
To: Amit Shrivastava [EMAIL
Hi Frank,
On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 16:25, Frank Schönheit wrote:
As the
glib integration is already in OpenOffice there doesnt seem to much
problem in linking evo-data-server/Orbit and dependent components
and calling the apis, hopefully ;-) .
Hmm. Linking OOo libraries with foreign
As the
glib integration is already in OpenOffice there doesnt seem to much
problem in linking evo-data-server/Orbit and dependent components
and calling the apis, hopefully ;-) .
Hmm. Linking OOo libraries with foreign components which are *not*
shipped together with OOo is
On Sun, 2004-01-18 at 11:54, wind li wrote:
Hi,Michael
This is Wind Li. I am working on StarOffice Address Book Integration
now.
Right; - I think the best way here is to proceed as was done for the
old-style gtk+ stuff; ie. a mess. You'll need to check-in binary builds
of the
Hi
I'm trying to use LDAP with evolution 1.4.3, no problems to do initial
setup. Evolution connects to our LDAP server to show me all supported
search bases. I haven't been able to use it though. When I try to query
the LDAP server evolution writes the following warnings:
(evolution:3459):
well, there's really no standard rule on what cn should contain..
It's used in many instances as the full name of the person, but in other
instances it's used as a unique id at that level of the tree..
Unfortunately the ldap backend is hardcoded to use that attribute for
full_name, so there's
hi,
i dont know the answer to your question... but wouldnt it be correct if your ldap server was made up like this:
cn=givenname surname etc
sn=surname
gn=givenname
uid=I0112233
and the dn:
uid=I0112233,dc=example,dc=org
cn is supposed to be the name of the entity, so i think evolution is
Hi,
I've got Evolution doing proper LDAP looks against our LDAP server
except for one problem. Our LDAP system uses a USER ID as the cn, i.e.
cn=I0112233. So browsing the LDAP contacts under Other Contacts or
trying to send an email to someone looked up via LDAP results in the
name being
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 13:02, J Dubal wrote:
Hello.
Evolution 1.2.4 (rpm installation) on RH 8.0 was able to access the
company openldap server for addresses. 1.4.4 does not. Anyone noticed
this problem? Any solution/workaround? I removed 1.4.4 and installed
1.2.4.
Any help will be
Hello.
Evolution 1.2.4 (rpm installation) on RH 8.0 was able to access the
company openldap server for addresses. 1.4.4 does not. Anyone noticed
this problem? Any solution/workaround? I removed 1.4.4 and installed
1.2.4.
Any help will be gratefully appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Dubal.
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 10:02, J Dubal wrote:
Hello.
Evolution 1.2.4 (rpm installation) on RH 8.0 was able to access the
company openldap server for addresses. 1.4.4 does not. Anyone noticed
this problem? Any solution/workaround? I removed 1.4.4 and installed
1.2.4.
No I have ldap access on
Hi all,
I'm currently looking at using evolution to access an exchange server.
I'm using the latest redhat 9 version 1.2.2-5 and i have a few problems.
I've done a bit of google searching, but i'm yet to see anyone complain
about this.
1) Calendar reminders dont appear - at all.
2) Probably a
Hi.
I'm currently using evolution 1.4.3 under debian unstable, and I have a
couple of questions regarding contacts.
Is it possible to store contact lists in ldap? I've got an ldap store
setup, using the evolutionperson.schema that ships with evo on debian.
Storing individual contacts works fine,
About the autocompletion: I have added the LDAP server to the completion
folder but I can't get any response. Here is what wombat says when I
type dal in the To: field in a new message:
searching server using filter: (| (displayName=dal*) (mail=dal*)
(|(cn=dal*)(sn=dal*)) (sn=dal*) )
Here is one LDAP record with all the fields. Maybe using filters with
non-existing field names would cause 0 results to be returned?
One LDAP record:
dn: cn=per,ou=Leave,ou=Users,l=HQ,o=NR
uamPosixSalt: K1
loginShell: /local/bin/tcsh
homeDirectory: /nr/user/per
gecos: Per Thomas Jahr
gidNumber:
yeah, that's a definite possibility - do you know what server you're
running?
Chris
On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 01:12, Per Thomas Jahr wrote:
Here is one LDAP record with all the fields. Maybe using filters with
non-existing field names would cause 0 results to be returned?
One LDAP record:
Yes, its Novell eDirectory. It's version 8.6 or 8.7.
On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 11:11, Chris Toshok wrote:
yeah, that's a definite possibility - do you know what server you're
running?
Chris
On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 01:12, Per Thomas Jahr wrote:
Here is one LDAP record with all the fields.
The LDAP backend doesn't initially populate any view like the
file/exchange backend do. This is because the amount of records
returned, what's queryable, etc, is server side configurable. It would
be misleading to have it display an initial set, when the server could
have truncated the response.
This is probably a feature request but...
Is there any way to sync an LDAP directory with to a particular category
within my Palm addressbook?
Our company has an internal LDAP contacts list, which I would like to
have available on my Palm, but keep it completely separate from my own
personal and
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 20:38, Strong, Mark wrote:
Hi people,
still haven't got the ldap auth to work. Evo v1.2.2 trying
Auth type distinguished name. Built from source with option
--with-openldap=yes (ldap works ok in anonymous mode).
from addressbook-sources.xml
ons, 2003-02-12 kl. 22:32 skrev Chris Toshok:
Perhaps someone could actually try to assist us in figuring out what is
wrong here. I'd like to continue to use EVO, but, I need access to my
company LDAP.
Hmm, I didn't receive this mail that Tony's responding to... private
mail?
No,
For what it's worth, the Phoebe (Red Hat 8.1 beta) build of Evolution
1.2.2 works perfectly with my Red Hat 8.0 openldap 2.0.27 server in SSL
mode. But the Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 build for Red Hat 8.0 never works.
See the bug here:
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=37383
I installed
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 02:13, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
ons, 2003-02-12 kl. 22:32 skrev Chris Toshok:
Perhaps someone could actually try to assist us in figuring out what is
wrong here. I'd like to continue to use EVO, but, I need access to my
company LDAP.
Hmm, I didn't receive this
man, 2003-02-10 kl. 23:39 skrev Strong, Mark:
Hey guys,
this LDAP problem, authenicating using distinguished name,
it is a known problem and your working on it aren't you?
a: I've never had any problems authenticating - to Openldap at least -
with any Evo version using any DN
Having a very heterogenous IT environment spread across several
countries we are trying to define an ldap schema which will provide all
the basic information about an individual or office one would normally
expect (using rfc standard object classes).
At the same time, we need this eventual
87 matches
Mail list logo
