I've been searching through the archives and found a few messages
relating the the Exchange Connector and the fact that it uses
GNOME:Evolution:ShellComponent to manipulate the interface.
Can anyone give me some examples on how this is achieved ? I'm
interested in how to create the folder tree
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 11:25, Dave Kelly wrote:
I've been searching through the archives and found a few messages
relating the the Exchange Connector and the fact that it uses
GNOME:Evolution:ShellComponent to manipulate the interface.
Can anyone give me some examples on how this is
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 21:33, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
I don't think that's the bug. I couldn't replicate the problem with the
attached program (e.g. it works fine and displays nothing).
Actually, it works fine here too. So it looks like you're right, and
this is a canvas issue after all
Hi there,
Can anybody tell me where I can find extra dictionaries for
Evolution to use during spell checking.
I am looking for the Afrikaans language dictionary.
Kind regards,
--
Leendert Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
KOVAC Technologies (Pty) Ltd.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Thank you for your answer, Eric!
In this case there are at least two persons being patient... :-))
Timm
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 23:32, Eric Lambart wrote:
Unfortunately not, though there have been so many requests to use a REAL
Trash folder (the standard Evo one is really just a vFolder--expunge
tor, 2003-01-09 kl. 22:07 skrev Jeffrey Stedfast:
Is this required/expected behaviour of Evolution?
yes, that is the imap message cache
(you are free to rm -rf anything in there if you want, though it'd be
better to not rm -f the summary file or evolution will have to do a
massive
I have a 3-line signature, as you see below, with only one blank line in it below my first name. Often, though not always, extra blank lines get inserted into the signature when it gets sent. Is there a way to prevent this.
Lane
Lane P. Lester / Madison County, Georgia
Running Linux more
hi,
i tested Evo 1.2 under Gentoo in the Xinerama Modus, and i saw that evo doesn`t work,
he can't connect to imap Server. If i start without Xinerama, evo works.
Is that a Problem from evo, or from GTK?
cu denny
___
evolution maillist - [EMAIL
Le ven 10/01/2003 à 13:39, Denny Schierz a écrit :
hi,
i tested Evo 1.2 under Gentoo in the Xinerama Modus, and i saw that evo doesn`t
work, he can't connect to imap Server. If i start without Xinerama, evo works.
Is that a Problem from evo, or from GTK?
I use it daily in Xinerama mode
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 15:29, Thomas J. Baker wrote:
Is ldaps supposed to work? I'm working on setting up an ldap server on a
stock Red Hat 8.0 system and have it running with ldap. I now want to
swtich to ldaps but the slapd server reports the following error when
Evo 1.2.1 tries to connect:
I was wondering if there is any way to get the following behavior in
Evolution:
My mail is handled by an IMAP server. When I delete a message, I would
like it to be moved to a local folder on my desktop machine so it can be
archived. I've tried to come up with some type of filter that would do
So I've been trying to diagnose why my Spell Checker in Evolution
doesn't function. I've had a few conversations with some folks on the
Users list who were quite helpful but weren't able to come up with an
answer. I thought I'd try this list and see if I can come up with a
solution.
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 09:50, Thomas J. Baker wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 15:29, Thomas J. Baker wrote:
Is ldaps supposed to work? I'm working on setting up an ldap server on a
stock Red Hat 8.0 system and have it running with ldap. I now want to
swtich to ldaps but the slapd server reports
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 10:38, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
Greetings,
How does one go about changing the attachment viewers? I'm having a
problem with the default viewer for .tif images where the inline vier,
EoG or Gimp don't show multiple pages of .tif images (which is the
format I recieve
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 12:46, Massimiliano Bini wrote:
Il mer, 2003-01-08 alle 18:10, Max Bini ha scritto:
Update: evo is back again?
what I have done? nothing more then a killev and killall oafd once more.
Note that I've done that before, too.
When things fail, you should try running
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 13:48, Dave Finnegan wrote:
Is it possible to import a comma separated value file into the
contacts db?
Not presently, no. It would be nice to have though...
--
Ettore Perazzoli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Is there a mailing list archive?
I missed how to setup the euro, wasn't paying attention :(
--
Hans Scheffers
http://www.jiffie.nl/stamboom/
The UPS is on strike.
Linux Kernel 2.4.18-19 on a i686 - userid 282784 @ http://counter.li.org
libgtkhtml1.1-3 and libgtkhtml20 are different parallel-installable
versions of the shared libraries, intended so that applications that
need different versions (e.g. evolution and gnucash) can use the
versions they need. Shouldn't be a problem.
-Mark Gordon
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 01:04, Willem
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 12:33, Alexandre Aractingi wrote:
Le mer 08/01/2003 à 17:40, Ettore Perazzoli a écrit :
You can try to check your GtkHTML font settings in the GNOME Control
Center and make sure you are using a font that has the Euro symbol in
it... (In practice, check that the
Le ven 10/01/2003 à 17:16, Ettore Perazzoli a écrit :
Yeah but GEdit uses the GTK font setting, Evolution uses the GtkHTML
one.
BTW I should have said change the font settings in Evolution, not in
GNOME Control Center (sorry, I was living in 1.0.x times when I wrote
that for some reason
fre, 2003-01-10 kl. 15:50 skrev Thomas J. Baker:
Does anyone have ldaps working?
Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't (Openldap 2.1.10/Berkeley
4.1.24 backend). I can't depend on it, and have to permanently disable
it, since I'm too bad-tempered to put up with the sporadic barfs.. Just
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 13:04, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
fre, 2003-01-10 kl. 15:50 skrev Thomas J. Baker:
Does anyone have ldaps working?
Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't (Openldap 2.1.10/Berkeley
4.1.24 backend). I can't depend on it, and have to permanently disable
it, since I'm
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 10:16, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 13:04, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
fre, 2003-01-10 kl. 15:50 skrev Thomas J. Baker:
Does anyone have ldaps working?
Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't (Openldap 2.1.10/Berkeley
4.1.24 backend). I can't
Jason - There are many many feature requests for Evolution in bugzilla.ximian.com. Most have a severity of Wishlist. You can search these and add yourself to be CC-ed list to be notified every time the bug is changed. If you cannot find a bug report that matches what you are looking for, you
I do here. Well, I just fixed a post-1.2.1 regression that was keeping
it from working, but 1.2.1 should work..
Are you connecting to port 389 and doing STARTTLS or connecting to 636?
Here's my server output (with my latest patch):
connection_read(9): checking for input on id=0
TLS trace:
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 13:27, Chris Toshok wrote:
I do here. Well, I just fixed a post-1.2.1 regression that was keeping
it from working, but 1.2.1 should work..
Are you connecting to port 389 and doing STARTTLS or connecting to 636?
Here's my server output (with my latest patch):
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 12:53, Yves Bajard wrote:
No, working in Konsole (in root), I typed the first command suggested by
Rick:
# rpm -qa ! grep spell
And here is the answer I got:
aspell-da-1.4.22-2
gnome-spell-o.5-1.ximian.3
aspell-devel-0.33.7.1-9
aspell-en-ca-0.33.7.1-9
Lane is right. It is inefficient and a time waster and I don't buy any
of the excuses I got to my similar previous post. (the suggestion was
that maybe the poster is not a list member -- nonsense)
Coincidentally, with this list being among the few that do not default
replies to the list, it is
fre, 2003-01-10 kl. 19:27 skrev Chris Toshok:
Are you connecting to port 389 and doing STARTTLS or connecting to 636?
Here's my server output (with my latest patch):
Hmmm ... what (Openldap?) version is that, and what debug level? It
doesn't tell me anything, compared to the debug output I
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 16:02, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
fre, 2003-01-10 kl. 19:27 skrev Chris Toshok:
Are you connecting to port 389 and doing STARTTLS or connecting to 636?
Here's my server output (with my latest patch):
Hmmm ... what (Openldap?) version is that, and what debug level? It
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 13:23, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
Coincidentally, with this list being among the few that do not default
replies to the list, it is ironic that the MUA which is its subject
treats its Reply to List feature as Reply to All. There should be a
difference.
Eh? This message
fre, 2003-01-10 kl. 17:23 skrev Alexandre Aractingi:
Le ven 10/01/2003 à 17:16, Ettore Perazzoli a écrit :
Yeah but GEdit uses the GTK font setting, Evolution uses the GtkHTML
one.
BTW I should have said change the font settings in Evolution, not in
GNOME Control Center (sorry, I was
fre, 2003-01-10 kl. 22:05 skrev Thomas J. Baker:
I'm using 2.0.25 from Red Hat 8.0 and the debug level was 5. I'm using a
self signed certificate.
Might work (I don't know 2.0.x at all, started with 2.1.2), but with
later Openldap versions you'd do better to make or buy a CA certificate
1.2.1, also, and this is a Reply to list, too. I think I have it
narrowed down. If the original message was addressed to the list only,
then Reply to List works. But if the 'original' message was a Reply
to All with the sender in the To field, and the list in the cc
field, then, even a Reply to
Yeah, I didn't really want to post a huge debug log, so I used -d 1.
OpenLDAP 2.0.27.
And yeah, it was bloody painful to get the thing set up and working
(sasl looks to be another round of the fun too, maybe it's time to
upgrade to 2.1 on the server side). I seem to recall someone having
Il ven, 2003-01-10 alle 17:19, Ettore Perazzoli ha scritto:
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 12:46, Massimiliano Bini wrote:
Il mer, 2003-01-08 alle 18:10, Max Bini ha scritto:
Update: evo is back again?
what I have done? nothing more then a killev and killall oafd once more.
Note that I've done
I have a self signed cert as well, and when I use mozilla I get the
Website Certified by Unknown Authority window.. Things work from
evolution though, without any warnings/errors.. I'd really like to add
that mozilla dialog's functionality into the evolution addressbook but
I'm not sure it's
Using Courier IMAP 1.6.2 and Evolution 1.2.1. I created a shared IMAP
folder and am able to subscribe and access it properly with Mozilla.
The folder in question is: shared.its.test. The subscribe dialog in
Evolution does not by default show the shared tree; it only shows what's
under INBOX.
We do not currently support multiple namespaces.
Jeff
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 18:45, Jason Tackaberry wrote:
Using Courier IMAP 1.6.2 and Evolution 1.2.1. I created a shared IMAP
folder and am able to subscribe and access it properly with Mozilla.
The folder in question is: shared.its.test.
No, the problem is that you are using Reply-to-List on the message that
was Cc'd to you and didn't pass through the mailing-list software and
thus does NOT have the mailing-list headers that Evolution checks for.
If you Reply-to-List on a message and Evolution can't figure out what
list it was
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 20:04, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
We do not currently support multiple namespaces.
Guess that explains it (except for the part where it was sort of working
for a little while.) Is this feature targeted for any specific future
version?
Thanks,
Jason.
One of my customers has a Toshiba e570 and wants to know if it will sync
with Evolution (or with linux at all).
TIA!
--
Sat Jan 11 12:10:00 EST 2003
12:10pm up 14:21, 3 users, load average: 0.12, 0.24, 0.31
--
|__
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 20:14, Jason Tackaberry wrote:
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 20:04, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
We do not currently support multiple namespaces.
Guess that explains it (except for the part where it was sort of working
for a little while.) Is this feature targeted for any specific
I missed the beginning of this thread, so this may have been answered
already. Is there any way to have a Reply to List button in the tool
bar? IMO the ideal would be to have the button only show up for
messages that came from a list server, but given that that may be
difficult or look odd
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 20:04, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
We do not currently support multiple namespaces.
Oddly enough, if I override the server-supplied namespace and leave the
field blank, things appear to work correctly. I can see both INBOX. and
shared. namespaces.
I guess I can expect odd
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 17:35, Dwight Tovey wrote:
I missed the beginning of this thread, so this may have been answered
already. Is there any way to have a Reply to List button in the tool
bar? IMO the ideal would be to have the button only show up for
messages that came from a list server,
I have Evolution 1.2.1-1ximian installed on a Libranet 2.7 (Debian Woody)
machine. It has worked without incident since I installed it about a
week ago. However, tonight I was in the process of sending a few
messages out and was copying text from one message to another (cut
paste) when on about
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 23:35, Chris Toshok wrote:
I have a self signed cert as well, and when I use mozilla I get the
Website Certified by Unknown Authority window.. Things work from
evolution though, without any warnings/errors.. I'd really like to add
that mozilla dialog's functionality
48 matches
Mail list logo
