One thing you could do which would be of use would be to sniff the
packets that Outlook sends to Google Mail's IMAP and log them for the
Evolution developers to read so that perhaps they can see what queries
Outlook is doing that is so much faster than what Evolution is doing and
maybe try to
Hi there,
t almost sounds impossible but still, and that's why I ask. I noticed
that the variable args in imap_command_strdup_vprintf is never freed.
That would be a rather large memory leak (almost every IMAP command is
created this way).
So I'm a bit stunned that nobody else ever saw this one
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 16:45 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
Hi there,
t almost sounds impossible but still, and that's why I ask. I noticed
that the variable args in imap_command_strdup_vprintf is never freed.
That would be a rather large memory leak (almost every IMAP command is
created
On Di, 2007-10-02 at 18:42 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
Anyway, if you want a simple way to build Evo from SVN without
rebuilding all of Gnome (as with GARNOME), give it a whirl!
http://mad-scientist.us/evolution.html
Thanks a lot for this, I found it very useful. It did not quite do
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 17:01 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
Hi Øystein
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 13:11 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote:
Google seem to be in the process of introducing IMAP support to GMail
[1]. Personally I think GMail offers an extremely attractive email
solution by now.
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 11:02 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 16:45 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
The patch is of course a simple + g_ptr_array_free (args, TRUE); right
before the return out;, right?
ps. Adding Jeffrey in CC as I think he has a good idea how this
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 03:25 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 11:58 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
I took a look at the IDLE implementation last night and felt it went
about it the wrong way.
Yes, you are right. I think the right fix is to create a new API called
