On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 10:10 +0530, Suman Manjunath wrote:
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 17:15, Patrick Ohly patrick.o...@gmx.de wrote:
The plan for change tracking is to get rid of the dependency on
e_book_get_changes(). I already stopped using e_cal_get_changes()
because it was too inflexible.
Il giorno gio, 08/01/2009 alle 00.10 +0100, Tobias Mueller ha scritto:
Hi,
On 07.01.2009 22:20, Stefano Canepa wrote:
2) what's going wrong the evolution built by jhbuild?
The build itself works properly, right? Running your newly build
Evolution fails, if I read your log correctly.
Hello Suman!
I forgot to ask: do you agree in general with the plan to do atomic
updates via e_book_commit_contact() and e_cal_modify_object() by
defining the semantic as suggested?
I also need to extend the proposal: removing an item has similar race
conditions (sync starts, user updates item,
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 12:45 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
Hello!
I'm currently thinking about synchronizing data with SyncEvolution in
the background while the user is active with the Evolution UI. Some
users already do that via cron jobs, but it is known to be problematic
for several reasons,
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 20:22 -0800, George Farris wrote:
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 23:20 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
My suggestion regarding the language would be to check out how easy it
is to write Evolution plugins in C and Python. Pick the one that you
find easier. Python is a nice language.
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 23:20 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
On user request the plugin will run syncevolution,
displaing an error message if there is no syncevolution on the
system
and the log and all messages of syncevolution if there are logs or
messages.
It wouldn't be hard to create and
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 15:19, Patrick Ohly patrick.o...@gmx.de wrote:
The GroupWise server updates the 'modified' property of the item when
it actually gets modified on the server. For newly created items, it
also adds the 'created' property at the same time.
This behavior invalidates all the
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 23:03 +0100, Stefano Canepa wrote:
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 20:22 -0800, George Farris wrote:
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 23:20 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
My suggestion regarding the language would be to check out how easy it
is to write Evolution plugins in C and Python.
On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 00:00 +0100, Stefano Canepa wrote:
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 23:20 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
It wouldn't be hard to create and install a libsyncevolution.so which
contains all the necessary logic to execute a sync. That might be
easier
than wrapping a command line tool.
