On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 15:05 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> Do you know of a good way to make that more detectable for developers,
> short of uninstalling Evolution?
>
> We've had several similar "insufficent LIBADD" bugs lately, all of which
> slipped in under my radar because I keep Evolution ins
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 08:23 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> You will only hit this if you don't already have Evo installed. If
> you have it installed then the link will use the installed version.
> Most likely that's the problem: the linker found a different libeshell
> somewhere on your system.
Do y
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 11:48 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> hrm, I would like to know why I didn't face that when doing the change
> there. Maybe an older gcc or something?
You will only hit this if you don't already have Evo installed. If you
have it installed then the link will use the installed ver
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 12:25 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 12:15 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> > What am I missing here?
>
> found it. Please apply this patch to fix the build:
Hi,
hrm, I would like to know why I didn't face that when doing the change
there. Maybe an older
