Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution-kolab: local cache for offline-work

2010-07-10 Thread chen
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 19:20 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote: Hi Chen, thank you very much for taking time to clarify things! Much appreciated. On Friday 09 July 2010 at 18:43:32 chen wrote: On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 18:25 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote: * Does there exist any infrastructure

Re: [Evolution-hackers] LFS in evolution-data-server

2010-07-10 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On jeu., 2010-07-08 at 14:19 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: Hey there, I'm the current evolution/eds/gtkhtml maintainer in Debian, and I'd like to ask a question. Ping? Any idea on that? -- Yves-Alexis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Evolution-hackers] LFS in evolution-data-server

2010-07-10 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 14:19 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: I recently enabled large file support in evolution-data-server in Debian. It seems that it leaded to the discover of some bugs on i386 installs (like http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=580419 /

Re: [Evolution-hackers] LFS in evolution-data-server

2010-07-10 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On sam., 2010-07-10 at 07:00 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 14:19 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: I recently enabled large file support in evolution-data-server in Debian. It seems that it leaded to the discover of some bugs on i386 installs (like

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution-kolab: Lifting the veil

2010-07-10 Thread chen
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 14:22 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 10:29 -0600, Sankar P wrote: (oh that out-of-tree Scalix backend is still using flat-file-summary-APIs-oh-wait-lets-ignore-it etc. types) Is evolution-scalix even alive? It hasn't seen a release in over two