On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 14:22 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: 
> On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 10:29 -0600, Sankar P wrote:
> > (oh that out-of-tree Scalix backend is still using
> > flat-file-summary-APIs-oh-wait-lets-ignore-it etc. types)
> 
> Is evolution-scalix even alive?
> It hasn't seen a release in over two years.
> 
> Same goes for evolution-jescs.
How about having all the collab-backends into a single package ?
evolution-collab-backends, which can hold exchange, groupwise, mapi,
kolab, (google?) etc. ? Any cons that you see ?

At-least we wanted to keep the backends such as Imap, pop, caldav, etc.
which were independent component providers inside eds itself.

- Chenthill.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> evolution-hackers mailing list
> evolution-hackers@gnome.org
> To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers




_______________________________________________
evolution-hackers mailing list
evolution-hackers@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Reply via email to