On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 14:22 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 10:29 -0600, Sankar P wrote: > > (oh that out-of-tree Scalix backend is still using > > flat-file-summary-APIs-oh-wait-lets-ignore-it etc. types) > > Is evolution-scalix even alive? > It hasn't seen a release in over two years. > > Same goes for evolution-jescs. How about having all the collab-backends into a single package ? evolution-collab-backends, which can hold exchange, groupwise, mapi, kolab, (google?) etc. ? Any cons that you see ?
At-least we wanted to keep the backends such as Imap, pop, caldav, etc. which were independent component providers inside eds itself. - Chenthill. > > _______________________________________________ > evolution-hackers mailing list > email@example.com > To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers