Re: [Evolution-hackers] RFC: Evolution's library requirements

2006-12-06 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 00:51 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote: > Hi fellow hackers, > > With reference to Bug 380534 on clarifying Evolution's library > requirements, I am putting down my thoughts and recommendations here and > will be proposing this in the weekly evolution meeting (#evolution-meet

Re: [Evolution-hackers] RFC: Evolution's library requirements

2006-12-05 Thread Ross Burton
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 16:28 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: > > I suggest that on upstream CVS, Evolution should depend on the most > > recent stable versions of the libraries available in the corresponding > > GNOME release (Evolution 2.9.x/2.8.x on GNOME 2.16, 2.6.x on GNOME > > 2.14). This is simi

Re: [Evolution-hackers] RFC: Evolution's library requirements

2006-12-05 Thread Matthew Barnes
I'll respond here since I may not be up in time for the 6 a.m. meeting tomorrow. Great feedback overall, just have a few comments. On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 00:51 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote: > On (a) Inbound Dependencies, > > I suggest that on upstream CVS, Evolution should depend on the mo

[Evolution-hackers] RFC: Evolution's library requirements

2006-12-05 Thread Harish Krishnaswamy
Hi fellow hackers, With reference to Bug 380534 on clarifying Evolution's library requirements, I am putting down my thoughts and recommendations here and will be proposing this in the weekly evolution meeting (#evolution-meet on irc.gimp.org at 1000 UTC 6 Dec 2006) tomorrow. Comments/questions we