On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 21:49 +, JP Rosevear wrote:
On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 15:03 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
Hi,
I discovered last week that there is an attempt to resurrect libical
from non-maintainership, merge all of the patches from various forks,
and start making sane releases
Ross,
It will be great if you can mail the details on the address book stuff
as well. I would like the libebook clients like OOo, etc to comment on
this.
-Srini.
On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 11:29 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
Hi,
Last week I committed a patch to libebook, and want to commit a patch
On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 11:29 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
Hi,
Last week I committed a patch to libebook, and want to commit a patch to
libecal[1], which removes private functions and types from the installed
headers. This has several consequences:
- e_cal_view_new() is removed
-
Ross,
From the current discussion, it looks like we are safe. Can we do
something like this for this release before we dung them out?
#ifdef E_D_S_DEPRECATED
#include bonobo/bonobo-object.h
#endif
-Srini.
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 10:32 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 12:15 +0530,
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 11:33 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
From the current discussion, it looks like we are safe. Can we do
something like this for this release before we dung them out?
#ifdef E_D_S_DEPRECATED
#include bonobo/bonobo-object.h
#endif
The patches consist of removing
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 11:33 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
#ifdef E_D_S_DEPRECATED
#include bonobo/bonobo-object.h
#endif
Just FYI, EDS_DISABLE_DEPRECATED is what Gtk-Doc looks for.
Matthew Barnes
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 17:19 +0200, Frederic Crozat a écrit :
Hi Evolution / E-D-S maintainers,
it appears that since CVS to SVN migration, no evolution / e-d-s release
was followed by a SVN tag creation in module_name/tags.
These tags are very useful for you, maintainers but also for
Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 19:24 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit :
Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 17:19 +0200, Frederic Crozat a écrit :
Hi Evolution / E-D-S maintainers,
it appears that since CVS to SVN migration, no evolution / e-d-s release
was followed by a SVN tag creation in
Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 18:03 +0200, Frederic Crozat a écrit :
Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 19:24 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit :
Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 17:19 +0200, Frederic Crozat a écrit :
Hi Evolution / E-D-S maintainers,
it appears that since CVS to SVN migration, no evolution /
Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 20:21 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit :
Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 18:03 +0200, Frederic Crozat a écrit :
Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 19:24 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit :
Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 17:19 +0200, Frederic Crozat a écrit :
Hi Evolution / E-D-S
Frederic,
One reason why me and Harish didn't want to tag is that we are able to
map the svn revision number to a particular release. I hope isn't so
difficult to get that from the ChangeLog/configure.in/NEWS commit logs.
At least that is how we do while preparing NEWS file for a dot release
to
Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 18:39 +0200, Frederic Crozat a écrit :
Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 20:21 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit :
Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 18:03 +0200, Frederic Crozat a écrit :
Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 19:24 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit :
Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 17:19
Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 16:36 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit :
Frederic,
One reason why me and Harish didn't want to tag is that we are able to
map the svn revision number to a particular release. I hope isn't so
difficult to get that from the ChangeLog/configure.in/NEWS commit logs.
At
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 12:38 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 11:33 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
From the current discussion, it looks like we are safe. Can we do
something like this for this release before we dung them out?
#ifdef E_D_S_DEPRECATED
#include
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 18:57 +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote:
Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 16:36 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit :
Frederic,
One reason why me and Harish didn't want to tag is that we are able to
map the svn revision number to a particular release. I hope isn't so
difficult to
Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 16:57 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit :
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 18:57 +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote:
Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 16:36 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit :
Frederic,
One reason why me and Harish didn't want to tag is that we are able to
map the svn
Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit :
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 20:35 +0200, Julien Puydt wrote:
TEL;TYPE=Home:sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TEL;TYPE=Home;TYPE=VOICE:sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TEL;TYPE=CELL:123.123.123.123\n
See it works now.
Ok, reported to the contacts developers, since it was using
17 matches
Mail list logo
