Re: [Evolution-hackers] future of evolution user docs.

2007-12-12 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Andre, On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 01:23 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 12.12.2007, 13:58 -0500 schrieb Matthew Barnes: > > On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 23:21 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > > > Frame files are the master copies here. > > the master copy should be in svn, in a format that i

Re: [Evolution-hackers] future of evolution user docs.

2007-12-12 Thread Andre Klapper
Am Mittwoch, den 12.12.2007, 13:58 -0500 schrieb Matthew Barnes: > On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 23:21 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > > Frame files are the master copies here. the master copy should be in svn, in a format that i can open && edit. having it in on someone's personal computer in some comp

Re: [Evolution-hackers] future of evolution user docs.

2007-12-12 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 23:21 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > Frame files are the master copies here. I think that should change if at all possible. > You think committing Frame files to svn would solve it? If so, I would > be happy to do that. The preferred work flow should be to import the Do

Re: [Evolution-hackers] future of evolution user docs.

2007-12-12 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 11:32 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 17:00 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > > The doc team here uses Frame and it has only an export to xml and so > > syncing from the commits/svn is no way possible, unless the frame is > > modified manually. If there a

Re: [Evolution-hackers] future of evolution user docs.

2007-12-12 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 17:00 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > The doc team here uses Frame and it has only an export to xml and so > syncing from the commits/svn is no way possible, unless the frame is > modified manually. If there are any better alternative that can be used, > lemme know, I can tr

Re: [Evolution-hackers] future of evolution user docs.

2007-12-12 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Hi Andre, On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 05:16 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > for a long time, several people have been unhappy with the current state > of the evolution user docs[1]. me too, but most of my rantings have been > on irc so i can't link to them. ;-) > > when evolution 2.0 became an official p

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Post-release version incrementing

2007-12-12 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> Tor, > It may not work out here, since the micro version is what we bump during > release which is in sync with the GNOME Release micro version. I sent the idea to desktop-devel-list and gtk-devel-list instead, as mbarnes suggested. Let's see if anything comes out of it. Some people seem to like