[Evolution-hackers] Upgraded to 2.21.5: can't read POP mail
Hi all; I upgraded to the latest SVN this morning but now I can't read my POP mailbox! It asks for a password, then doesn't download anything. If I click SendReceive again, it asks for a password again, then still doesn't download anything. See: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=509644 Bummer :-/. ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Possible memory leak
El lun, 14-01-2008 a las 14:33 +0100, Philip Van Hoof escribió: > I think this needs to be something like this: > > GSList *item = cc->status_stack; > cc->status_stack = g_slist_remove_link(cc->status_stack, item); > g_slist_free (item); Or just use g_slist_delete_link: cc->status_stack = g_slist_delete_link (cc->status_stack, cc->status_stack); AFAIK it frees the list node. -- Jose Dapena Paz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Igalia ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Warning: careful rebuilding with my makefile!!
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 19:33 -0500, Reid Thompson wrote: > gentoo also does not yet offer 2.15 GLIB either ( stable or ~ ). Which kinda > puts me in a bind, since it appears that the last successful build I got has > an > issue with logging into exchange OWA. I guess I'll be failing over to mutt > && > tbird for a few days -- trying to decide if I wanna introduce GLIB 2.15 or > not. > Anyone have any heads up issues re GLIB 2.15? GLib 2.15 has the new GIO module, which is still getting fleshed out and should be considered unstable until GLib 2.16 is released. But as long as you're not compiling anything that uses the new API, you should be fine using GLib 2.15. Regarding libsoup 2.4, there's some significant API changes from 2.2 and so it's not compatible with any current Evolution release. As to when we'll be migrating to it, to my knowledge the team has not yet discussed it but our policy is to develop against the latest stable GNOME platform (i.e. Evo 2.21.5 must build on GNOME 2.20). So if libsoup 2.4 gets in GNOME 2.24 (it's too late for GNOME 2.22 since we're already in an API freeze), my guess is we won't be moving to it until Evolution 2.25/2.26 at the earliest. But I'm not yet sure what the GNOME release team has in mind. Matthew Barnes ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Warning: careful rebuilding with my makefile!!
Paul Smith wrote: > Hi all; > > This morning just after the 2.21.5 release of Evo was announced, the 2.4 > branch of libsoup was merged to the trunk. > > This version is not that easy to build: it requires a newer version of > GLIB than is available in Ubunut Gutsy, at least (2.15 or better, while > Gutsy contains 2.14.1) Plus, someone reported to me that even after > getting a new-enough GLIB, they still couldn't finish building libsoup: > > gcc -g -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations > -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith -D_REENTRANT -o > .libs/context-test context-test.o test-utils.o > ../libsoup/.libs/libsoup-2.4.so -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/opt/evo/lib > ../libsoup/.libs/libsoup-2.4.so: undefined reference to > `g_cancellable_is_cancelled' > > So, maybe you need something even more new than suggested by the > configure.in file! I haven't tried this myself so I can't say for sure. > > (thanks to Gareth Doutch for the heads-up!) > gentoo also does not yet offer 2.15 GLIB either ( stable or ~ ). Which kinda puts me in a bind, since it appears that the last successful build I got has an issue with logging into exchange OWA. I guess I'll be failing over to mutt && tbird for a few days -- trying to decide if I wanna introduce GLIB 2.15 or not. Anyone have any heads up issues re GLIB 2.15? ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
[Evolution-hackers] Warning: careful rebuilding with my makefile!!
Hi all; This morning just after the 2.21.5 release of Evo was announced, the 2.4 branch of libsoup was merged to the trunk. This version is not that easy to build: it requires a newer version of GLIB than is available in Ubunut Gutsy, at least (2.15 or better, while Gutsy contains 2.14.1) Plus, someone reported to me that even after getting a new-enough GLIB, they still couldn't finish building libsoup: gcc -g -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith -D_REENTRANT -o .libs/context-test context-test.o test-utils.o ../libsoup/.libs/libsoup-2.4.so -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/opt/evo/lib ../libsoup/.libs/libsoup-2.4.so: undefined reference to `g_cancellable_is_cancelled' So, maybe you need something even more new than suggested by the configure.in file! I haven't tried this myself so I can't say for sure. (thanks to Gareth Doutch for the heads-up!) -- - Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://make.mad-scientist.us "Please remain calm--I may be mad, but I am a professional."--Mad Scientist ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
[Evolution-hackers] Disabled code in Evolution has a bug
Hi there,
In Evolution this code is not used (imap_parse_namespace_response ->
imap_namespace_decode), nonetheless it contains a bug.
If the delimiter for a namespace is NIL, the imap_next_word will search
for the first space. This ain't correct if there are no parameters to
parse. For example (("MyShared" NIL)).
http://tinymail.org/trac/tinymail/changeset/3263#file2
I'm adding Jeffrey in CC because I think he once intended to use this
code to improve namespace support?
Camel-lite has gotten too specific in this area of the code: it supports
the shared and personal namespace by only asking for LSUB recursively
for those two namespaces, and LIST and LSUB for the personal namespace.
The namespace-line parsing, however, is recovered from things that I
found in existing (but not used) camel's imap code.
ps. I commented out the original line in camel-lite because the += 3
might not be the right fix (perhaps is fixing imap_next_word better).
Hf.
--
Philip Van Hoof, freelance software developer
home: me at pvanhoof dot be
gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org
http://pvanhoof.be/blog
http://codeminded.be
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Possible memory leak
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 11:55 +0100, Jose Dapena Paz wrote: > El lun, 14-01-2008 a las 14:33 +0100, Philip Van Hoof escribió: > > > I think this needs to be something like this: > > > > GSList *item = cc->status_stack; > > cc->status_stack = g_slist_remove_link(cc->status_stack, item); > > g_slist_free (item); > > Or just use g_slist_delete_link: > > cc->status_stack = g_slist_delete_link (cc->status_stack, cc->status_stack); > AFAIK it frees the list node. This is what got committed, indeed. -- Philip Van Hoof, freelance software developer home: me at pvanhoof dot be gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org http://pvanhoof.be/blog http://codeminded.be ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
