[Evolution-hackers] Remove duplicate plugin
Hi all, is there somebody who made working the "Remove duplicate" plugin on Evolution 2.30 and above? I have Mandriva 2010.1 One and evo 2.30.3 with KDE 4.4.3. Sometimes my evo downloads all my emails twice and as a result I get hundreds of duplicate emails. In the past I used to use the plugin but on evo 2.30 and above the plugin doesn't work. I asked the developers and they told me, that I have to do a patch above source code. Unfortunately it didn't work because it is too old. One of them gave me your email with "maybe it help". Does onyone have patched or even created rpm package for mandriva? Thank you for your reply. Ondrej ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Merging the collaboration providers in a single package
>>> On 10/18/2010 at 07:01 PM, in message <1287408711.3126.11.ca...@localhost.localdomain>, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 12:10 +0530, chen wrote: > > The other solution was to maintain all exchange providers in a single > > package, merging evolution-exchange, evolution-ews and evolution-mapi > > into a single package. Other collaboration providers like > > evolution-groupwise and evolution-kolab (yet to be upstreamed) will > > remain as separate packages. > > If we -have- to glob providers together I would prefer the alternate > solution: merge all the Exchange providers into one git module, break > GroupWise out from E-D-S into it's own git module, and leave the rest > alone. > > This is not unlike the recent gnome-games debate on desktop-devel-list, > except that we already have shared libraries for the common parts with > fairly stable APIs (libebook, libecal, etc.). > > Jon's comments on the gnome-games issue reflect my own for this one: > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2010-October/msg00049.html > > I prefer not to have every provider in its own module. If we make changes in the baseclass, it will be ignored and won't go into unmaintained providers. More providers translates to more work for packagers downstream and also during the release time for maintainers as well, with not much benefits. Just my 2 cents. Sankar ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Merging the collaboration providers in a single package
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 12:10 +0530, chen wrote: > The other solution was to maintain all exchange providers in a single > package, merging evolution-exchange, evolution-ews and evolution-mapi > into a single package. Other collaboration providers like > evolution-groupwise and evolution-kolab (yet to be upstreamed) will > remain as separate packages. If we -have- to glob providers together I would prefer the alternate solution: merge all the Exchange providers into one git module, break GroupWise out from E-D-S into it's own git module, and leave the rest alone. This is not unlike the recent gnome-games debate on desktop-devel-list, except that we already have shared libraries for the common parts with fairly stable APIs (libebook, libecal, etc.). Jon's comments on the gnome-games issue reflect my own for this one: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2010-October/msg00049.html ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
