Matthew,
This also would do. But normally we would bump it during the next dot
release. Anyways is fine IMO.
-Srini.
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 14:10 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 23:03 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> > The version bump normally happens during the first unsta
On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 22:13 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 22:21 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > I suppose I can call g_signal_connect(ebook, "backend-died", mycallback,
> > NULL), then in mycallback print an error and abort the process, right?
>
> > Aborting the process is a very
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 23:03 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> The version bump normally happens during the first unstable release in
> the trunk. I'm wondering how is it that it is requesting for > 3.14.
>
> Ah, I remember, I approved a patch for gnome-2-20 branch and asked to
> commit to head al
The version bump normally happens during the first unstable release in
the trunk. I'm wondering how is it that it is requesting for > 3.14.
Ah, I remember, I approved a patch for gnome-2-20 branch and asked to
commit to head also (I think so). For now I can revert till the first
unstable release/
Will gtkhtml be bumped soon?
Is there a 'usual' way around this?
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
> someone will
> inevitably waste time maintaining them, not realizing or forgetting
> they're dead.
Oh yes. I remember doing that several times when I was porting it to Windows...
--tml
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
Looks like it isn't there for Evolution Exchange alone. I can see for
Evolution/EDS/GtkHTML. I don't seems to have rights for that.
-Srini.
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 16:47 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> I was just going to try to file a bug against the evolution-exchange
> component in bugzi
