Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution requesting info on every year from 2011 down to 65535

2011-02-16 Thread Milan Crha
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 00:48 +0100, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote: > I've attached the backtrace for a year of 167 (I think) though I don't > think it gives much information. This happens even if I have my main > calendar off (which I think it's the only one with recurring events). Hi, this is

[Evolution-hackers] Evolution requesting info on every year from 2011 down to 65535

2011-02-16 Thread Carlos Martín Nieto
Hi all, I'm running evo master, and I've been getting weird messages, about the year being below 1900 (the assert in libecal's time_days_in_month(). I've put a g_print() statement to print the year on each run. The messages scroll too fast for me to see each one, but I could see the years countin

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [SyncEvolution] Issues with evolution 2.32 and syncevolution 1.1.1a

2011-02-16 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Mi, 2011-02-16 at 10:40 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: > This change had to be accounted for in many places throughout > Evolution > and E-D-S and I think we missed a few in the initial 2.32 release > (Milan > Crha, I believe, fixed the remaining issues in 2.32.2). I ran 2.32.2 from Debian unstab

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [SyncEvolution] Issues with evolution 2.32 and syncevolution 1.1.1a

2011-02-16 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 15:11 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > I believe a user ran into issues with the migration of the .evolution > file layout - at least that is what I am seeing while trying to > reproduce the issue. I see "FAILED" remarks for the migration itself and > then calendar and contact fac

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [SyncEvolution] Issues with evolution 2.32 and syncevolution 1.1.1a

2011-02-16 Thread Patrick Ohly
Hello Matthew! I believe a user ran into issues with the migration of the .evolution file layout - at least that is what I am seeing while trying to reproduce the issue. I see "FAILED" remarks for the migration itself and then calendar and contact factories are unhappy about "e_source_get_uri () c

Re: [Evolution-hackers] GroupWise mail issue (Was: (no subject))

2011-02-16 Thread Antono Vasiljev
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 07:29 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > > Your last few mails are displayed as I have attached below in a > > non-open mail client that I use (GroupWise). > I guess it's the X-Face header doing trouble for GroupWise. I think that fetch and display gravatar (http://gravatar.com/) is