Re: [Evolution-hackers] Further thoughts on ESources

2011-08-25 Thread Milan Crha
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 12:46 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > Proposal: > > I think the key file management needs to be centralized in a new D-Bus > service, tentatively called "e-source-registry". The ESourceRegistry > singleton class in client programs would then be a proxy for the D-Bus > service

[Evolution-hackers] Further thoughts on ESources

2011-08-25 Thread Matthew Barnes
Now that my head's back into account management issues, I wanted to brain storm about something that's been knocking around in my brain for a few weeks. Seeing how David Zeuthen implemented the Online Accounts service I think has influenced my thinking. Right now on the account-mgmt branch I've g

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Which version of Evolution for RHEL/CentOS 5.5?

2011-08-25 Thread Milan Crha
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 17:28 -0700, Ken Nishimura wrote: > I'm thinking of compiling a newer version of Evolution than what is shipped > with our RHEL5 distro. Specifically, I want to try the MAPI data connector > which is needed to talk to our corporate MS Exch 2007 server. As you > will all poin

[Evolution-hackers] Which version of Evolution for RHEL/CentOS 5.5?

2011-08-25 Thread Ken Nishimura
I'm thinking of compiling a newer version of Evolution than what is shipped with our RHEL5 distro. Specifically, I want to try the MAPI data connector which is needed to talk to our corporate MS Exch 2007 server. As you will all point out, RHEL5 is ancient. However, we are stuck with it for rea