[Evolution-hackers] UI interaction from book/calendar backends

2012-11-22 Thread Milan Crha
Hi, the book/calendar backends are currently designed to not have any direct UI interaction with user, they basically serve for data only. While it works, it has its caveats, like when user tries to access server using SSL with self-signed certificate. This should be done like in Camel,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Drop or limit ChangeLog files in tarball releases?

2012-11-22 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Thu, 2012-11-22 at 08:52 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: I'm only waiting for an opinion from Matthew, then I'll happily change the build script. I guess I don't have a strong attachment to it. ChangeLog files are technically part of the GNU Coding Standards [1], and strictly speaking the product

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Drop or limit ChangeLog files in tarball releases?

2012-11-22 Thread Michael Hasselmann
On Thu, 2012-11-22 at 11:45 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: Also, just for the record, the script snippet I'm using to generate the ChangeLog file comes from https://live.gnome.org/Git/ChangeLog. So ChangeLog already gets auto-generated from git log on make dist, for each release. Why would there