On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 16:58 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 21:27 +, Philip Withnall wrote:
> > This sounds good. Do I have to make any fixes to the Google Contacts
> > address book backend, or will it all be handled centrally? (i.e. With
> > this GNetworkMonitor change, w
The google addressbook backends only allows writes while online, and I
need to reliably detect this and display the editable state in
Gnome Contacts. The addressbook readonly property is propagated via
folks, so theoretically this should be doable. However, a series of
failures is causing problems
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 05:50 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 15:33 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > Btw, I was thinking about this. Is this kind of solution really
> > needed? I mean, its easy to bump the timeout for the async ops, and i
> > think the
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 16:49 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> Main reason for this change was a fact that some operations may timeout
> on a DBus call, because backend wasn't able to finish the requested
> operation in a given time (defined by DBus; later with some workaround
> on eds side). It could tim
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 17:09 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 13:01 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > Secondly, why is it using a dbus signal for the done callbacks?
> > Wouldn't it be more sane to use a direct message (without expecting a
> > reply)
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 16:49 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 13:01 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > I needed the most recent eds to test the folks eds backend, and I picked
> > up the new dbus EBook APIs. Unfortunatelly that seemed to be completely
> > bro
I needed the most recent eds to test the folks eds backend, and I picked
up the new dbus EBook APIs. Unfortunatelly that seemed to be completely
broken for me (evolution contacts hanged, test-self in the tests
hanged), so I have debugged it. Turns out that it was sending a dbus
signal like get_cont
