Hello Harish,
I get problems with evolution-exchange. I have been using
ldap from evo-openldap-2.1.23-1.ximian.9.1, but this does not include
LDAP_CONTROL_PAGEDRESULTS which is now required.
If I use the standard Fedora 6 ldap (openldap-2.3.27-4) I do not have
ntlm, so this is no
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 01:32 +0530, Veerapuram Varadhan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The Evolution Team is pleased to announce the release of Evolution 2.9.4
>
But I still cannot build it. I have been using
/opt/evo-openldap (The very old evo openldap rpm)
/usr/lib/evo-openldap (Fedora use this f
Hi Srinivasa,
I do feel a failure that I am unable to compile evolution on
Fedora 7. I asked a year ago (FC5) about ldap_open / ntlm_bind linking
problems, and am trying to adapt an answer I got then, by editing the
configure files by hand to add ' -lssl -lcrypto -lsasl2' to the comp
> > problems, and am trying to adapt an answer I got then, by editing
> the
> > configure files by hand to add ' -lssl -lcrypto -lsasl2' to the
> compile
> > test lines. That allows configure to work.
> > But then in compiling evolution-exchange the same problem is hit
> > again, and I am not
> > Maybe I should be taking the redhat src rpm apart?
> >
> > If I just download the release and configure/compile it then configure
> > it using /usr/lib/evolution-openldap (and also I had to
> > add /usr/include/nspr4) then it does not find ldap_open or ntlm_bind.
> > checking for ld
On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 19:52 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 23:50 +0200, William Murray wrote:
> > Hm, well I don't THINK your fixes are helping me.
> > I am using a 32 bit machine, so I ignore the 64 bit one, but the link
> > order doe
Hi guys,
I finally got evo/exchange 'working', but there are problems. The
evolution-exchange component starts to consume 50% of my CPU, and
beageld takes another 50%. Somehow these two are interacting badly.
What debug should I do?
Bill
__
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 20:55 +0530, Veerapuram Varadhan wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 11:37 +0200, William Murray wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >I finally got evo/exchange 'working', but there are problems. The
> > evolution-exchange component starts to consume
Excellent...
but compiling on Fedora 8 gives:
which: no gtkdoc-rebase in (/usr/bin:/bin)
This seems to be to do with gnome version advancement, which is
what evolution is synced to, so I guess I am lost unless I upgrade more of
gnome?
Thank you,
Bill
___
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 15:53 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 19:33 +0000, William Murray wrote:
> > Excellent...
> >but compiling on Fedora 8 gives:
> > which: no gtkdoc-rebase in (/usr/bin:/bin)
> > This seems to be to do with gnome ve
Hi Per,
Could you try to connect again, using a completely fresh
account? Your symptoms look so like mine that I just feel it must be the
same.
BTW I do all these tests in a special test account to ensure my
normal email survives.
Bill
_
And my favourite feature request:
DISABLE LDAP if you cannot see the server.
I need to tunnel in to my work to get the LDAP server; without
access Evo hangs for 1 minute between each transaction. And some places
I cannot make the tunnel, so evo is unusable.
Bill
On Mon, 2008
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 19:10 +0530, Johnny Jacob wrote:
> :-)
>
> William , Can you tell me the package versions ?
>
> Thanks !
> --
>
> Johnny Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://johnnyjacob.org
>
> GPG fingerprint = E296 D0B9 77D9 D968 5574 DB0D 5FD0 B7CA 03DC E845
Hi Johnny,
I am runn
13 matches
Mail list logo