On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 13:22 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 16:55 +0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> >
> > I kid you not.
> >
> > You can see this just by going to your own outlook web server (when you
> > highlight a message, you'll see an empty tall oblong, click and it will
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 16:55 +0400, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> I kid you not.
>
> You can see this just by going to your own outlook web server (when you
> highlight a message, you'll see an empty tall oblong, click and it will
> bring up the categories).
>
> Exchange allows arbitrary labels (lik
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 16:01 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 17:46 +0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> > I think you probably need me to get a feel for evolution development
> > initially before you set me loose in the repo ...
>
> Why? It's mostly my baby, and I'm a kernel hacker
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 17:46 +0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> I think you probably need me to get a feel for evolution development
> initially before you set me loose in the repo ...
Why? It's mostly my baby, and I'm a kernel hacker too... :)
> Incidentally, I presume you use bugzilla for bugs? I
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 14:34 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 17:08 +0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> >
> > > could you use Gnome's bugzilla for patch reviews, please?
> >
> > Consider this more an RFC requiring feedback than a patch requiring
> > review.
>
> For Evo-EWS I'm mu
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 17:08 +0400, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> > could you use Gnome's bugzilla for patch reviews, please?
>
> Consider this more an RFC requiring feedback than a patch requiring
> review.
For Evo-EWS I'm much happier with patches in email anyway. I find it a
lot easier to review
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 14:21 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 14:41 +0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> > This patch ...
>
> Hi,
> could you use Gnome's bugzilla for patch reviews, please?
Consider this more an RFC requiring feedback than a patch requiring
review.
James
> It ha
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 12:19 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 14:41 +0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> >
> > +
> > + /* this is a mapping from Exchange/Outlook categories to
> > +* evolution labels based on the standard colours */
> > + const gchar *labels[] =
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 14:41 +0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> This patch ...
Hi,
could you use Gnome's bugzilla for patch reviews, please?
It has couple reasons why:
a) bugzilla is meant for that
b) bugzilla has integrated tools for patches and their review
c) it's easier to follow (broken)
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 14:41 +0400, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> +
> + /* this is a mapping from Exchange/Outlook categories to
> +* evolution labels based on the standard colours */
> + const gchar *labels[] = {
> + "Red Category", "$Labelimportant",
> +
This patch is a proof of concept for adding evolution labels to an
exchange back end. The outlook categories perform roughly the same
function, and evolution even mirrors their colour scheme.
This patch allows evolution to fill in the labels from the EWS
Category element. That means that any col
11 matches
Mail list logo
