Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution library consolidation

2012-12-23 Thread Daniel Vrátil
On Thursday 13 of December 2012 06:43:15 Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 08:59 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > > I didn't understand from the initial announcement that you'll not only > > merge those above in one .so, but that you'll also move all the files > > into one folder. This makes

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution library consolidation

2012-12-13 Thread Milan Crha
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 06:43 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: > The old partitioning is still reflected in the API documentation. I > don't see anything messy about having the source files in a flat list. > GTK+ is able to manage its widgets well enough with a similar layout. Hi, API documenta

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution library consolidation

2012-12-13 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 08:59 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > I didn't understand from the initial announcement that you'll not only > merge those above in one .so, but that you'll also move all the files > into one folder. This makes it quite messy to find anything, the > previous file layout was better

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution library consolidation

2012-12-13 Thread Milan Crha
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 15:30 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: > > The new libeutil will include APIs that are currently scattered > across: > > > >a11y/libevolution-a11y.so > >e-util/libeutil.so > >filter/libfilter.so > >widgets/e-timezone-dialog/libetimezonedialog.so > >widgets/edi

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution library consolidation

2012-12-12 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 08:59 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: > I expect this is a couple days worth of "monkey work", but I should have > it done by mid-week in time for the 3.7.3 release. Just committed this to master. If you're building from git, I would strongly advise blowing away your current in

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution library consolidation

2012-12-09 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 14:20 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: > Immediately after the merge I'm going to consolidate Evolution's base > libraries into a single base utility library. "libeutil" seems as good > a name as anything else I can think of, so I'm going to stick with that. Since the webkit-com

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution library consolidation

2012-11-27 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 14:20 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: > The new libeutil will include APIs that are currently scattered across: > >a11y/libevolution-a11y.so >e-util/libeutil.so >filter/libfilter.so >widgets/e-timezone-dialog/libetimezonedialog.so >widgets/editor/libeeditor.s

[Evolution-hackers] Evolution library consolidation

2012-11-27 Thread Matthew Barnes
I'm currently smoke testing Dan's webkit-composer branch before giving him the go-ahead to merge it to master. Immediately after the merge I'm going to consolidate Evolution's base libraries into a single base utility library. "libeutil" seems as good a name as anything else I can think of, so I'