Re: [Evolution-hackers] building evolution-data-server against the already installed libdb

понеділок 06 березень 2006 10:28, Jeffrey Stedfast Ви написали: > Back when I was still on the project, the problem was that users could > not migrate their data between different machines running different > distributions (or different versions of the same distribution) because > of file format ch

Re: [Evolution-hackers] building evolution-data-server against the already installed libdb

On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 13:48 -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > понеділок 06 березень 2006 10:28, Jeffrey Stedfast Ви написали: > > Back when I was still on the project, the problem was that users could > > not migrate their data between different machines running different > > distributions (or differ

Re: [Evolution-hackers] building evolution-data-server against the already installed libdb

Back when I was still on the project, the problem was that users could not migrate their data between different machines running different distributions (or different versions of the same distribution) because of file format changes that were continuously happening in libdb (even between minor revi

Re: [Evolution-hackers] building evolution-data-server against the already installed libdb

В Пнд, 06/03/2006 в 09:25 +, Ross Burton пишет: > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=319393 contains a patch we've > been using in the DBus port of EDS to use a dynamic libdb. Instead of > simply hacking away at the makefiles it adds an option, so is suitable > for integration. > > EDS

Re: [Evolution-hackers] building evolution-data-server against the already installed libdb

On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 17:49 -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Hello! > > I'm trying to convince the maintainers of the evolution-data-server > FreeBSD port () > to build the software against the db4-version installed by the separate > port of Sl

Re: [Evolution-hackers] building evolution-data-server against the already installed libdb

As far as I can recall, when I asked the same thing, the response was that this is how Berkeley DB is supposed to be used, "embedded" into another product. That some (all?) Linux distributions choose to also ship a separately installed instance was irrelevant ;) --tml ___

Re: [Evolution-hackers] building evolution-data-server against the already installed libdb

On 3/6/06, Mikhail Zabaluev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I used to compile e-d-s 1.4 along an external db4.3, by applying a > simple patch. It didn't seem to cause any problems. You are of course free to apply your own patches; however, in the long term, using a distribution's version of bdb will

Re: [Evolution-hackers] building evolution-data-server against the already installed libdb

В Пнд, 27/02/2006 в 17:49 -0500, Mikhail Teterin пишет: > I'm trying to convince the maintainers of the evolution-data-server > FreeBSD port () > to build the software against the db4-version installed by the separate > port of SleepyCat's db4

[Evolution-hackers] building evolution-data-server against the already installed libdb

Hello! I'm trying to convince the maintainers of the evolution-data-server FreeBSD port () to build the software against the db4-version installed by the separate port of SleepyCat's db4 (). I'm using the