Re: [Evolution-hackers] CamelService changes

2011-09-14 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 16:43 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote: > Please forgive me for not reading the Camel code here - can one guess > from the UID to which account it may belong? Yes, in fact it's trivial now: CamelService.uid == EAccount.uid > What's more, in the current evolution-kolab design

Re: [Evolution-hackers] CamelService changes

2011-09-14 Thread Christian Hilberg
Hi there, I know it is muc hlate for input, but anyway, here we go: Am Donnerstag 21 April 2011, um 18:43:27 schrieb Matthew Barnes: > To help smooth the way for the account-mgmt I've made a few improvements > to the CamelSession and CamelService APIs in 3.1. It's not necessarily > the *final* A

Re: [Evolution-hackers] CamelService changes

2011-04-25 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 11:02 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: >> Mostly sounds fine to me as a  complete picture, but do remember of >> the email-factory branch that I'm working on to run mail on EDS. >> >> I now expose an API (and some custom

Re: [Evolution-hackers] CamelService changes

2011-04-22 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 11:02 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > Mostly sounds fine to me as a complete picture, but do remember of > the email-factory branch that I'm working on to run mail on EDS. > > I now expose an API (and some custom bits) over dbus that corresponds > to camel's session/store

Re: [Evolution-hackers] CamelService changes

2011-04-21 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Hey Matt, On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Matthew Barnes wrote: > To help smooth the way for the account-mgmt I've made a few improvements > to the CamelSession and CamelService APIs in 3.1.  It's not necessarily > the *final* APIs that will wind up in 3.2, but more like the first round > of ch