Re: [Evolution-hackers] XDG Base Directories -- Wrapping Up

2010-07-27 Thread Milan Crha
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 18:08 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: For those following the master branch of git, that means that with any luck your ~/.evolution directory will soon be gone and you'll have far more control over where Evolution writes files. Hi, does this mean that one would be

Re: [Evolution-hackers] XDG Base Directories -- Wrapping Up

2010-07-27 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 19:23 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 18:08 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: I now have all the migration routines written and I'm fairly happy with them. A few more cases to test and I think I may commit this over the weekend. I decided to defer

Re: [Evolution-hackers] XDG Base Directories -- Wrapping Up

2010-07-25 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 18:08 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: I now have all the migration routines written and I'm fairly happy with them. A few more cases to test and I think I may commit this over the weekend. I decided to defer this until at least Tuesday, so that those developers who aren't

Re: [Evolution-hackers] XDG Base Directories -- Wrapping Up

2010-07-24 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 07:48 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: An an evolution user and a packager, is this really a good idea? Shouldn't it be safer to keep it “as a backup” but mark it as already migrated. This way, another attempt can be tried should the first one fail, and we don't touch user