I hereby allow you to relicense all the code I wrote for evolution and
evolution-data-server under the terms of the LGPL v2 and LGPL v3.
This includes the code that supports addressbooks on a webdav server and
all other code I have contributed to evolution.
Greetings,
Matze
Am Freitag, de
I hereby allow you to relicense all the code I wrote for evolution and
evolution-data-server under the terms of the LGPL v2 and LGPL v3.
This includes the code that supports addressbooks on a webdav server and
all other code I have contributed to evolution.
Greetings,
Matthias Braun
Am Fr
Am 11.07.2008 um 13:21 schrieb Srinivasa Ragavan:
Hello guys,
We have had a set of problems that we are carrying around for some
time like :
* Copyright assignments, which is not the best way looking for
the future of Evolution. It sucks and sort of limits contributions
to Evoluti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> We have had a set of problems that we are carrying around for some time like :
>
> * Copyright assignments, which is not the best way looking for the
> future of Evolution. It sucks and sort of l
> * Move Evolution licensing to "LGPL v2 and LGPL v3" to let us re-use
> the code more easily around the platform. This also moves us closer to
> Thunderbird's MPL/LGPL model.
I am told that you guys have found some of my code in Evolution that
is gpl2 (only) and that you would like to ha
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 04:21 -0600, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> It would be really helpful if you can post a public/explicit mail with
> permissions to do it, or code pointers - if you think you wrote a
> piece of Evolution code & object.
Permission granted for default-mailer plugin (and any other c
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 04:21 -0600, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> Hello guys,
> It would be really helpful if you can post a public/explicit mail with
> permissions to do it, or code pointers - if you think you wrote a
> piece of Evolution code & object.
Permission granted for any pieces i've persona
I remember sending an Evolution copyright assignment to Ximian. Just
in case you also need my permission, but could not reach me via old
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I agree to the re-licensing of any Evolution code I have written.
Would be nice if you changed the email, or, if you are not aware of
a
Permission granted to relicence my code (committed as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Thanks,
Philip
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 04:21 -0600, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> We have had a set of problems that we are carrying around for some time like :
>
> * Copyright assign
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Srinivasa Ragavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> We have had a set of problems that we are carrying around for some time like :
>
> * Copyright assignments, which is not the best way looking for the
> future of Evolution. It sucks and sort of li
Hello
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 12:35 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 04:21 -0600, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> > It would be really helpful if you can post a public/explicit mail with
> > permissions to do it, or code pointers - if you think you wrote a
> > piece of Evolution code & o
Hi,
[As Srini asked me to do this,]
I approve the planned license change for all of the code I ever
contributed to Evolution.
Cheers,
-Michael
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolut
2008-07-11 (금), 04:21 -0600, Srinivasa Ragavan 쓰시길:
> We think this is good for Evolution and (of course) we continue to
> invest in Evolution. We are also working to ensure we have the rights
> to re-license all of the code. We will do the licensing/header changes
> as we audit the code ownership
Hey Folks,
On 11.07.2008 12:21 Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
It would be really helpful if you can post a public/explicit mail with permissions
to do it, or code pointers - if you think you wrote a piece of Evolution code &
object.
Permission granted to relicense the code I've produced to "LGPL
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 12:35 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 04:21 -0600, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> > It would be really helpful if you can post a public/explicit mail with
> > permissions to do it, or code pointers - if you think you wrote a
> > piece of Evolution code & object.
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 04:21 -0600, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> It would be really helpful if you can post a public/explicit mail with
> permissions to do it, or code pointers - if you think you wrote a
> piece of Evolution code & object.
Permission granted for any code I've produced.
Ross
--
Ross
And another one, who's been poked about this mail. Sorry, kind of missed
it, despite discussing this at GUADEC.
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 04:21 -0600, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> * Drop Evolution copyright assignments and make it really easy to
> contribute to Evolution
> * Move Evolution licensing to
Le vendredi 11 juillet 2008 à 04:21 -0600, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit :
> Hello guys,
>
> We have had a set of problems that we are carrying around for some time like :
>
> * Copyright assignments, which is not the best way looking for the
> future of Evolution. It sucks and sort of limits
Hello,
Apparently I've been told that I have some code in evolution, despite having
no memory of it. Anyway, since I assume you guys know better than I do, I
guess I do.
So in that case, feel free to relicense any of my code as outlined below.
George
Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
Hello guys,
I was kindly asked for this:
Permission granted for any pieces of code I've produced.
Lucian Langa.
>
> We have had a set of problems that we are carrying around for
> some time like :
>
> * Copyright assignments, which is not the best way
>
After getting explicitly asked for this:
Permission granted for any pieces of code I've produced.
andre klapper
Am Freitag, den 11.07.2008, 04:21 -0600 schrieb Srinivasa Ragavan:
> We have had a set of problems that we are carrying around for some time like :
>
> * Copyright assignments, w
Le samedi 16 août 2008 à 12:12 +0200, Kjartan Maraas a écrit :>
> I didn't think my contributions were substantial enough to warrant this
> but Michael poked me about it so here you go. Permission granted for any
> pieces of code I've produced.
Sankar got me on irc but I forgot to send a mail so
fr., 11.07.2008 kl. 04.21 -0600, skrev Srinivasa Ragavan:
> Hello guys,
>
> We have had a set of problems that we are carrying around for some time like :
>
> * Copyright assignments, which is not the best way looking for the
> future of Evolution. It sucks and sort of limits contributions
I just wanted to chime in and say AWESOME!!! :-)
It is my hope that now that Evolution no longer requires assignment,
that we'll see more developers get involved with improving it - who
knows, maybe someone will even contribute an uber IMAP
implementation? :-)
Jeff (retired Evolution hacker)
On
On Sat, 2008-07-12 at 13:56 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Could you consider talking with the samba guys to make libmapi LGPLv3?
> That would make things much easier, right?
Yep - would make life easier; OTOH I've spoken to them in the past
along these lines - but though they were init
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 9:47 PM, Patrick Ohly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 04:21 -0600, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
>> * Drop Evolution copyright assignments and make it really easy
>> to contribute to Evolution
>> * Move Evolution licensing to "LGPL v2 and LGPL v
On Sat, 2008-07-12 at 00:14 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Sure - but there are real problems persuading lawyers
... and developers ...
> to license code
> under a license that doesn't yet exist & that they havn't read :-)
AfC
Sydney
--
Andrew Frederick Cowie
Operational Dynamics is an
Hi Paul,
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 12:46 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> Once you start accepting a significant amount of code without copyright
> assignment, it will be difficult to the point of impossibility to change
> the license again.
Yes. Hence (in part) the choice of a more liberal / lesse
Hi Paul,
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 15:30 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > * Move Evolution licensing to "LGPL v2 and LGPL v3" to let us re-use
> > the code more easily around the platform.
>
> Did you mean LGPLv2 _or_ LGPLv3 here?
Yes; it's dual licensed - which gives people rather a choice of
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 04:21 -0600, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> We have had a set of problems that we are carrying around for some
> time like :
>
> * Copyright assignments, which is not the best way looking for
> the future of Evolution. It sucks and sort of limits contributions to
> Evolutio
> * Move Evolution licensing to "LGPL v2 and LGPL v3" to let us re-use
> the code more easily around the platform.
I'm a little concerned with this plan in conjunction with the "getting
rid of copyright assignment" plan.
Once you start accepting a significant amount of code without copyright
ass
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 04:21 -0600, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> * The current licensing incompatibility issues of Evolution with
> Samba4/libmapi (GPLv3). Evolution needs to link with libmapi/samba4
> for the new mapi based connector being developed for Exchange 2007.
[...]
> * Move Evolution lic
32 matches
Mail list logo
