Re: [Evolution-hackers] About the new camel_pstring_add implementation

2006-07-12 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Sun, 2006-07-09 at 13:04 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > These can be replaced with the new camel_pstring_add using FALSE as > parameter. Replacing them will also remove the need for the normal > camel_pstring_strdup and therefore also remove the need for the gboolean > own parameter of camel_ps

Re: [Evolution-hackers] About the new camel_pstring_add implementation

2006-07-12 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 10:17 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > On Sun, 2006-07-09 at 13:04 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > > These can be replaced with the new camel_pstring_add using FALSE as > > parameter. Replacing them will also remove the need for the normal > > camel_pstring_strdup and therefor

[Evolution-hackers] About the new camel_pstring_add implementation

2006-07-09 Thread Philip Van Hoof
These can be replaced with the new camel_pstring_add using FALSE as parameter. Replacing them will also remove the need for the normal camel_pstring_strdup and therefore also remove the need for the gboolean own parameter of camel_pstring_add. camel-folder-summary.c: to->subject = camel_pstring_st