On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 22:52 +, Seb James wrote:
> Hi Philip,
>
> I've not done any work on this recently, but I've not forgotten it; just
> been busy with other things.
>
> On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 05:44 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> [snip]
> > If you want to implement a specialised version fo
Hi Philip,
I've not done any work on this recently, but I've not forgotten it; just
been busy with other things.
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 05:44 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
[snip]
> If you want to implement a specialised version for "spool" folders, fill
> in the function pointer like this:
(in ca
On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 19:19 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 10:05 +, Seb James wrote:
>
> > So, do you think it makes sense for e-d-s to expunge messages from
> the
> > unix mail spool?
>
>
> It makes sense that you want to try it. Whether that also means that
> the
> E
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 10:05 +, Seb James wrote:
> So, do you think it makes sense for e-d-s to expunge messages from the
> unix mail spool?
It makes sense that you want to try it. Whether that also means that the
Evolution Mailer maintainers will include your code is a different
question.
Y
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 05:44 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> Hey Seb,
>
> Thanks for your interest in wanting to improve Camel. Multiple projects
> would benefit from your contributions, so I'll explain how you can
> implement what you want to try to do (not sure if your specific feature
> makes a
Hey Seb,
Thanks for your interest in wanting to improve Camel. Multiple projects
would benefit from your contributions, so I'll explain how you can
implement what you want to try to do (not sure if your specific feature
makes a lot sense, but nevertheless is it good that you are at least
reading c
Hi List,
I'm looking at the local provider for camel, written by Michael Zucchi.
It seems to be related to Bug 213072, which is now rather old, and which
affects me.
I'm trying to understand the code to begin with.
I use a standard unix mail spool as my inbox, and I am wondering why it
is that I
