Re: [Evolution-hackers] future of evolution user docs.

2007-12-12 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Hi Andre, On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 05:16 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: for a long time, several people have been unhappy with the current state of the evolution user docs[1]. me too, but most of my rantings have been on irc so i can't link to them. ;-) when evolution 2.0 became an official part

Re: [Evolution-hackers] future of evolution user docs.

2007-12-12 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 17:00 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: The doc team here uses Frame and it has only an export to xml and so syncing from the commits/svn is no way possible, unless the frame is modified manually. If there are any better alternative that can be used, lemme know, I can try

[Evolution-hackers] future of evolution user docs.

2007-12-11 Thread Andre Klapper
for a long time, several people have been unhappy with the current state of the evolution user docs[1]. me too, but most of my rantings have been on irc so i can't link to them. ;-) when evolution 2.0 became an official part of GNOME 2.8, aaron was working full-time on the evolution docs. now my