On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 09:16 +1030, Not Zed wrote:
I don't understand why the option is called 'show only sub'? Doesn't it
mean 'only update subscribed'?
Just a limitation of the way Camel lets you add your own options.
The 'show only sub' option does precisely what 'use_lsub' used to.
If
Miles:
That's in the development (1.5.x and 2.0) branch, and you're certainly welcome to help work on it! We'll have daily snapshots up and running soon, but if you compile from CVS or even use the last binary snapshots (from before Christmas, I think) you should be able to get a feel for
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 05:41, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 09:16 +1030, Not Zed wrote:
I don't understand why the option is called 'show only sub'? Doesn't it
mean 'only update subscribed'?
Just a limitation of the way Camel lets you add your own options.
The 'show only
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 09:37, David Woodhouse wrote:
[snip]
In the case where we _don't_ take subscription to mean that a folder
should be visible, I cannot comprehend any _other_ meaning for 'active'
folders other than that they are the ones which receive new mail. Can
you?
What if I want
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 10:12 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
What if I want to show only subscribed folders but only want evo to
check a subset of those subscribed folders?
That's another reasonable feature request.
It seems to make sense.
it's a hack.
The implementation's a hack, indeed.
Not Zed wrote:
Hmm... I don't really think I would like this, personally... I
specifically disabeled the short a.c.o.l.installation notation in the
subscribe editor because, for large lists, it is hard to keep an
overview of the hierarchy... but anyway, made it a configuration option
(though
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 23:38 +0100, Meilof wrote:
Not Zed wrote:
Hmm... I don't really think I would like this, personally... I
specifically disabeled the short a.c.o.l.installation notation in the
subscribe editor because, for large lists, it is hard to keep an
overview of the
Not Zed wrote:
I still fail to see how this has anything whatsoever to do with the
subscription dialogue.
It already shows totally different names in the folder tree vs the
subscription dialogue.
There are 3 separate fields, full_name, path, and name. The last is
used to display the name in the
Sigh. But if you don't do it within 10 seconds you get a timeout. Its
just a noop.
No, that's not true. The point is, INN waits 10 seconds before your
/first/ command after mode reader before timeouting, but once you have
sent it a command (which now happens directly after
Hi guys,
I know at least one of you is going to linux.conf.au in Adelaide next
week. Although i'm not actually going to the conference (bad
organisation on my part and we're just too busy anyway), i'll still be
in Adelaide (more bad organisation, i was supposed to have moved to
Perth by now).
10 matches
Mail list logo
