Hi,
I modified the eds to have proxy support using gconf for the http
calendar backend.
I made a patch and would like to submit it ...
jens
--
Jens Reimann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dentrassi.de
ICQ: 119027938
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 10:12 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
Currently you have to import their public key separately.
Are you saying it should automatically and with no user input, always
import keys on any messages you receive?
Not necessarily. Adding:
keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve
to
Hi,
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 13:55 +0300, Enver ALTIN wrote:
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 10:12 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
Currently you have to import their public key separately.
Are you saying it should automatically and with no user input, always
import keys on any messages you receive?
Sorry
On sn, 2004-05-16 at 22:25 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote:
Would it perhaps be a good idea to split the ntlm related stuff into a
library to be maintained and packaged separately? That way, the openldap
- evolution interdependency is gone, which would be nice for the
different distributions.
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 12:28 +0100, Ricardo Costa wrote:
Not necessarily. Adding:
keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve
to ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf will do it.
I believe this only works for gpg keys. Whit certificates you do not
know the location of the public key (it varies with the CA
On Hn , 2004-05-17 at 14:15 +0200, Sren Hansen wrote:
On sn, 2004-05-16 at 22:25 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote:
Would it perhaps be a good idea to split the ntlm related stuff into a
library to be maintained and packaged separately? That way, the openldap
- evolution interdependency is gone,
On man, 2004-05-17 at 09:28 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote:
I don't know how long it would
take though. Of course, we would still depend on some patch to OpenLDAP
for Evolution Exchange to work properly.
How so? If OpenLDAP learns how to speak NTLM, what do we need a special
version for?
Oh, no.
I can't remember off the top of my head where I read it, but I believe
that the patch to OpenLDAP merely puts hooks into it to call the actual
NTLM functions inside Evolution.
Other way around. The patch adds an API to OpenLDAP that takes an NTLM
request and constructs an LDAP auth request
On man, 2004-05-17 at 10:10 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote:
How so? If OpenLDAP learns how to speak NTLM, what do we need a special
version for?
Because it will take at least a year to make it into the distros
properly.
Oh, ok. That makes sense.
Current situation:
Ximian Connector contains
Right, the patched OpenLDAP doesn't actually depend on evolution, it's
just that the new API isn't useful on its own.
But anyway, we should try to get a better solution. If the OpenLDAP team
is interested in adding NTLM support to OpenLDAP, then we can send them
There IS work underway to add
10 matches
Mail list logo
