Re: [Evolution-hackers] camel-split in? eds or not

2004-08-25 Thread Rodrigo Moya
On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 10:57 +0800, Not Zed wrote: * Fewer packages to maintain. I would add: * a single package for accessing all evolution data. You mean, apart from libsoup, gnome and gtk+ libs, etc :) yeah :) that's why it could be a good reason: to avoid increasing

[Evolution-hackers] Gaim-Evolution integration

2004-08-25 Thread Praveen Kumar
Hi, I am attempting to integrate gaim presence status into evolution as described on http://www.gnome.org/bounties/IM.html#127546. I have a few questions regarding this --- I am a little confused as to where all places the presence icon should be displayed, specifically, a. In the

Re: [Evolution-hackers] camel-split in? eds or not

2004-08-25 Thread Hans Petter Jansson
On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 16:34 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 10:57 +0800, Not Zed wrote: * Fewer packages to maintain. I would add: * a single package for accessing all evolution data. You mean, apart from libsoup, gnome and gtk+ libs, etc :) yeah :)

Re: [Evolution-hackers] camel-split in? eds or not

2004-08-25 Thread Peter Colijn
* Fewer packages to maintain. I would add: * a single package for accessing all evolution data. I really favour the camel in e-d-s option, because it makes e-d-s the one-stop-shop for accessing Evolution data. I think that is actually a convenience for developers, not a hindrance. Well, I