On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 04:03, Hans Petter Jansson wrote:
Broken clocks...
Will cause all manner of other problems.
I believe the same argument can be made for configure and Makefile.in. A
lot of people have problems with automake et al, problems that would be
solved if you could
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 02:54, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 04:03, Hans Petter Jansson wrote:
Broken clocks...
Will cause all manner of other problems.
Well, true. In the end, I guess I'm just a good old-fashined hard-liner
:) I like to think I'm not unreasonable, though,
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 22:36, Hans Petter Jansson wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 08:38, Radek Doulk wrote:
btw, my HEAD evo still crashes after these errors:
icalerror.c:99: FILE: An operation on a file failed. Check errno for more detail.
evolution: icalerror.c:100: icalerror_set_errno:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 21:14, Hans Petter Jansson wrote:
I don't like keeping generated files in CVS. If we edit the lex file, or
apply changes from upstream, it is likely to cause trouble.
Why ? the time-stamp will be updated on an upstream-merge - and when
you run make, new lexer
On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 08:10, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 21:14, Hans Petter Jansson wrote:
I don't like keeping generated files in CVS. If we edit the lex file, or
apply changes from upstream, it is likely to cause trouble.
Why ? the time-stamp will be updated on an
I believe I've addressed most of the build issues with the new libical
now. It should build nicely out of a clean checkout, but you'll need
Flex 2.5.31, available from http://lex.sourceforge.net/ if you're
compiling from CVS. I've removed the generated files.
Sorry about the high version
This is bloody painful, why remove the generated sources? Almost nobody is ever going to edit the yacc files.
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 04:20 -0500, Hans Petter Jansson wrote:
I believe I've addressed most of the build issues with the new libical
now. It should build nicely out of a clean
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 11:21, Not Zed wrote:
This is bloody painful, why remove the generated sources? Almost
nobody is ever going to edit the yacc files.
I don't like keeping generated files in CVS. If we edit the lex file, or
apply changes from upstream, it is likely to cause trouble. The
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 18:10, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 17:48 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
I hate to play community bitch here, and this is obviously a situation
where there is no non-sucky technical solution, but every time you add
another 'oh, just download foo that you
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 08:50, JP Rosevear wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 05:20, Hans Petter Jansson wrote:
Sorry about the high version requirement - since Flex is changing
rapidly, and libical needs some functionality from Flex 2.5.7, we could
either require flex == 2.5.7 or flex = 2.5.31
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 15:24, Larry Ewing wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 15:14, Hans Petter Jansson wrote:
What's so bad about installing a new flex in a prefix?
It increases the build requirements that are already way too high. It
is already far too difficult to build Evolution from source
Quite. But i'll bitch all i want, thank you very much.
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 16:38, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
Oh well whatever, i'v egot around it by not building the calendar anymore.
You know, in the time you have spent bitching about this you would have
had the latest version of flex
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 16:41 -0500, Not Zed wrote:
Quite. But i'll bitch all i want, thank you very much.
Actually, no, you don't.
In case you didn't notice, the list is not for bitching; it's for
discussing development, and finding solutions to problems. You can keep
all the flames and snide
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 19:20, Luis Villa wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 18:10, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 17:48 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
I hate to play community bitch here, and this is obviously a situation
where there is no non-sucky technical solution, but every time
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 17:57 -0400, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 16:41 -0500, Not Zed wrote:
Quite. But i'll bitch all i want, thank you very much.
Actually, no, you don't.
In case you didn't notice, the list is not for bitching; it's for
discussing development, and
15 matches
Mail list logo
