RE: [Evolution-hackers] gnome-vim editor component for evolution

2001-11-30 Thread Ali Akcaagac
On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 23:02, Jason D. Hildebrand wrote: > There's no reason why the same method wouldn't work for emacs. I guess I thought > that most emacs users run a mail client _inside_ of emacs, and wouldn't > be interested in evolution at all. :) heh :-) who want's to run an OS inside

RE: [Evolution-hackers] gnome-vim editor component for evolution

2001-11-30 Thread Jason D. Hildebrand
There's no reason why the same method wouldn't work for emacs. I guess I thought that most emacs users run a mail client _inside_ of emacs, and wouldn't be interested in evolution at all. :) On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 15:30, Jeremy Wise wrote: > > Big woo... Where's the emacs version? Why

Re: [Evolution-hackers] gnome-vim editor component for evolution

2001-11-30 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
Awesome! ;-) Jeff On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 15:58, Jason D. Hildebrand wrote: > I posted about this a few months ago, and I think I've got something to the stage >where > others may be interested in taking a look. > > I've created a bonobo component which embeds VIM inside a zvt widget, and implem

[Evolution-hackers] gnome-vim editor component for evolution

2001-11-30 Thread Jason D. Hildebrand
I posted about this a few months ago, and I think I've got something to the stage where others may be interested in taking a look. I've created a bonobo component which embeds VIM inside a zvt widget, and implements part of the GtkHTML interface. It works with Evolution (if you hack evolution a

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Post-1.0 PGP wishlist (was Re: [Evolution]pgp unusable?)

2001-11-30 Thread Dan Winship
> I'm a US citizen, so I don't know if I can contribute code to this > effort. But if were legal for me to do so, I'd be more than happy to > help. 1) The old export restrictions were only on code that performed cryptography, and wouldn't have affected things like remembering passwords and decid

[Evolution-hackers] Post-1.0 PGP wishlist (was Re: [Evolution] pgp unusable?)

2001-11-30 Thread Eric Kidd
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 15:33, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > THIS IS A BUG IN GPG! > > gpg tells us everything went fine, so Evolution has no way of knowing > that it didn't encrypt to all the recipients we told it to encrypt to, > thus it's not our fault. Yuck. There's actually several of these

Re: [Evolution-hackers] to be usable

2001-11-30 Thread Ali Akcaagac
On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 16:44, Jamin W. Collins wrote: > > - why put a "--" before my signature? the signature in my signature file > > is my full signature and I don't would like to add an extra line with > > 2 dash! > > Because this is standard netiquette. The -- indicates the start of the >

Re: [Evolution-hackers] to be usable

2001-11-30 Thread Jamin W. Collins
On Wed, 2001-11-28 at 11:36, Levente Farkas wrote: > what I use. rh 7.2 with ximian gnome (everything from Ximian GNOME Desktop > and Evolution Snapshot) current verion: > evolution-0.99.1-snap.ximian.20040858 Latest Evolution RPM build to my knowledge is evolution-0.99.2-ximian3.i386.rpm >