Re: [Evolution-hackers] Configurable Reply Attribution UI?

2002-05-30 Thread Zbigniew Chyla
On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 16:48:53, Anna Marie Dirks wrote: I have looked at this problem a bit, and have arrived at a proposal for a GUI: http://primates.ximian.com/~anna/attribution_1.png . You may also download a glade file for this (helpful if you want to use the standard Evolution spacing,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Configurable Reply Attribution UI?

2002-05-30 Thread Carlos Perelló Marín
El jue, 30-05-2002 a las 14:06, Zbigniew Chyla escribió: On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 16:48:53, Anna Marie Dirks wrote: I have looked at this problem a bit, and have arrived at a proposal for a GUI: http://primates.ximian.com/~anna/attribution_1.png . You may also download a glade file for this

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Configurable Reply Attribution UI?

2002-05-30 Thread Dan Winship
It would be nice to have different attribution for every language you use. Of course Evo should automatically pick the right language using some attribute of the recipient (X-EVOLUTION-PREFERRED-LANGUAGE maybe). X-EVOLUTION-PREFERRED-LANGUAGE would be also useful in other contexts, eg. to

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Configurable Reply Attribution UI?

2002-05-30 Thread Carlos Perelló Marín
El jue, 30-05-2002 a las 14:44, Dan Winship escribió: It would be nice to have different attribution for every language you use. Of course Evo should automatically pick the right language using some attribute of the recipient (X-EVOLUTION-PREFERRED-LANGUAGE maybe).

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Configurable Reply Attribution UI?

2002-05-30 Thread Matt Avery - Sun UK
I always thought that Re: comes from the latin for thing (as in Republic = things of the people), and it became common in english through leagal documents which use a lot of latin terms (sub judice, habeas corpus) and so forth. So Re: would have quite good international credentials. Dunno about

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Configurable Reply Attribution UI?

2002-05-30 Thread Dan Winship
On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 11:16, Matt Avery - Sun UK wrote: I always thought that Re: comes from the latin for thing (as in Republic = things of the people), and it became common in english through leagal documents which use a lot of latin terms (sub judice, habeas corpus) and so forth. So Re:

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Configurable Reply Attribution UI?

2002-05-30 Thread Jim Meyer
On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 06:43, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen wrote: I think it is nice with a little non-English culture here and then. I'm with Kenneth. Those non-English attributions keep fresh in my mind that we are a multicultural community; the actual information (date and time) is easy to

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Configurable Reply Attribution UI?

2002-05-30 Thread Luis Villa
On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 12:01, Dan Winship wrote: On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 11:16, Matt Avery - Sun UK wrote: I always thought that Re: comes from the latin for thing (as in Republic = things of the people), and it became common in english through leagal documents which use a lot of latin terms

[Evolution-hackers] About the evolution architecture.

2002-05-30 Thread Cheung Suet Lung
Hello everybody, first of all I would like to know did anybody receive my mail yesterday? I have send a mail about chinese wording problem yesterday. However I don't find it in the mailing list. And this time I would like to ask about the evolution architecture. I would like someone to verify my

Re: [Evolution-hackers] About the evolution architecture.

2002-05-30 Thread Cheung Suet Lung
Thank u very much for answering my question. In fact even I don't set anything, evolution can show the chinese words. However when it doesn't find the word in the font, it searchs in other fonts. However it usually finds the bold and italic font instead. I don't think evolution convert mails to