On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 01:04 -0800, Fred Liu wrote:
> Is there anyone who has ever met this?
Hi,
there have been some bug reports in https://bugzilla.gnome.org but the
fix came to the quite recent:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=608320
Bye,
Milan
___
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 11:37 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 01:04 -0800, Fred Liu wrote:
> > Is there anyone who has ever met this?
>
> Hi,
> there have been some bug reports in https://bugzilla.gnome.org but the
> fix came to the quite recent:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/s
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 11:41 -0500, Shreyas Phadnis wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 1:35 AM, chen wrote:
> There is no documentation for imapx yet. You can refer to the
> documentation for camel in www.go-evolution.org it is up to
> date as of
> now. Also feel free t
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 1:35 AM, chen wrote:
> There is no documentation for imapx yet. You can refer to the
> documentation for camel in www.go-evolution.org it is up to date as of
> now. Also feel free to clarify your doubts on irc #evolution channel.
>
>
Thanks. I will refer to this documentati
This weekend I discovered a particularly nasty bug in gcc 4.4 where gcc
would mistakenly optimize out important sections of code
when it encountered a particular trick used in a ton of places inside
Evolution (EDList and pretty much everywhere custom single-linked lists
are used inside at least Cam
Le 1 févr. 2010 à 17:52, Jeffrey Stedfast a écrit :
>
> This weekend I discovered a particularly nasty bug in gcc 4.4 where gcc
> would mistakenly optimize out important sections of code
> when it encountered a particular trick used in a ton of places inside
> Evolution (EDList and pretty much e
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 11:52 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> This weekend I discovered a particularly nasty bug in gcc 4.4 where gcc
> would mistakenly optimize out important sections of code
> when it encountered a particular trick used in a ton of places inside
> Evolution (EDList and pretty much
