Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution 2.28 does not load calendars anymore

2010-03-30 Thread Milan Crha
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 05:03 +0200, Thomas Mittelstaedt wrote: > There also is an error message: > > (evolution:6613): libecal-WARNING > **: ../../../../evolution-data-server/calendar/libecal/e-cal.c:1046: > Could not activate calendar factory > (OAFIID:GNOME_Evolution_DataServer_CalFactory:1.2) >

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Build failure in evolution 2.30.0 (was Re: Patch for Evo 2.30 - size of mail sidebar)

2010-03-30 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 04:10 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > Can we get a 2.30.0.1 tarball that uses some non-deprecated API or, even > better, that doesn't use -DGTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED by default? Even better, can we get a macro added to gnome-common that implements this deprecation flag policy, and

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Build failure in evolution 2.30.0 (was Re: Patch for Evo 2.30 - size of mail sidebar)

2010-03-30 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 30 mars 2010, à 09:18 -0400, Matthew Barnes a écrit : > On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 04:10 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > > Can we get a 2.30.0.1 tarball that uses some non-deprecated API or, even > > better, that doesn't use -DGTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED by default? > > Even better, can we get a macro

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Build failure in evolution 2.30.0 (was Re: Patch for Evo 2.30 - size of mail sidebar)

2010-03-30 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 15:35 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > Le mardi 30 mars 2010, à 09:18 -0400, Matthew Barnes a écrit : > > Even better, can we get a macro added to gnome-common that implements > > this deprecation flag policy, and perhaps even set a GNOME Goal for it? > > Sure, it'd be nice to hav

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Build failure in evolution 2.30.0 (was Re: Patch for Evo 2.30 - size of mail sidebar)

2010-03-30 Thread chen
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 10:18 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 15:35 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > > Le mardi 30 mars 2010, à 09:18 -0400, Matthew Barnes a écrit : > > > Even better, can we get a macro added to gnome-common that implements > > > this deprecation flag policy, and pe

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Build failure in evolution 2.30.0 (was Re: Patch for Evo 2.30 - size of mail sidebar)

2010-03-30 Thread Federico Mena Quintero
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 04:10 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > Can we get a 2.30.0.1 tarball that uses some non-deprecated API or, even > better, that doesn't use -DGTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED by default? Ugh, sorry about the breakage. I'm building Evo on GTK+ for GNOME 2.28; that's why I didn't notice thi

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution 2.28 does not load calendars anymore

2010-03-30 Thread Thomas Mittelstaedt
Milan, I just "blew" a couple of those G_DEFINE_TYPE's. Got to concentrate better. Weitergeleitete Nachricht > Von: Evolution-Data-Server > An: tmsta...@t-mittelstaedt.de > Betreff: [Bug 603854] evolution segfaults in e_book_new, when > right-clicking in task list in calendar v

Re: [Evolution-hackers] build Evolution with jhbuild - unsuccessfull result

2010-03-30 Thread Kjartan Maraas
sø., 28.03.2010 kl. 21.41 +0300, skrev Ivan A. Kostyuk: > Hello dear colleagues. > > I did the build with help of jhbuild I got following errors: > Running aclocal-1.11... > /home/WORK/opt/gnome2/share/aclocal/audiofile.m4:12: warning: > underquoted definition of AM_PATH_AUDIOFILE > /home/WORK/opt