On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 15:22 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
Hi all. I'm wondering if anyone can provide a summary/recommendation
for IMAP vs. IMAP+ (IMAPX) in Evo 2.30 (I'm actually building the very
latest gnome-2.30 branch from git)?
I use a dovecot IMAP server which I don't think supports any
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 16:14 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote:
Hi there,
reading about the new IMAPX implementation used by Evo =2.30, I found it
stated that
Maybe if imapx had come up before, many backends such as groupwise, mapi
etc. would have followed this design rather than a sync
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 11:03 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 15:22 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
Hi all. I'm wondering if anyone can provide a summary/recommendation
for IMAP vs. IMAP+ (IMAPX) in Evo 2.30 (I'm actually building the very
latest gnome-2.30 branch from git)?
Hi,
I have found that evolution-data-server-2.30.1 installs libedataserver
as libtool version 11 (libedataserver-1.2.so.11) whereas
evolution-data-server-2.30.2.1 installs it as libtool version 13
(libedataserver-1.3.so.13).
I didn't spot this until I was half-way through installing
gnome-2.30.2
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 22:20 +0100, Chris Vine wrote:
I have found that evolution-data-server-2.30.1 installs libedataserver
as libtool version 11 (libedataserver-1.2.so.11) whereas
evolution-data-server-2.30.2.1 installs it as libtool version 13
(libedataserver-1.3.so.13).
Rationale for the
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:36:51 -0400
Matthew Barnes mbar...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 22:20 +0100, Chris Vine wrote:
I have found that evolution-data-server-2.30.1 installs
libedataserver as libtool version 11 (libedataserver-1.2.so.11)
whereas evolution-data-server-2.30.2.1
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 22:53 +0100, Chris Vine wrote:
Can you help me on what gnome components compiled for gnome-2.30.0/1
might now be broken and require recompilation (apart from evolution
itself, that is)? It looks from that bug report as if that will
include ekiga, as well as empathy.
