What if the interface was 1) independent of Tracker, i.e. any
application would be able to use it to access E-D-S, and 2) a desktop
standard for accessing application data stores, implemented by many
client applications? Would you then still be opposed to it?
Anders Feder
Den 07-09-2011 03:52
I just pushed a new snapshot of my "account-mgmt" branch for Evolution
and Evolution-Data-Server.
http://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution/log/?h=account-mgmt
http://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution-data-server/log/?h=account-mgmt
This is mostly for backup -- I haven't yet reached any particularly
si
Once 3.3 development is underway, one thing I'd like to do is promote
the EExtension framework in Evolution to libedataserver as a replacement
for e-data-server-module.c.
The EExtension framework was introduced in Evolution 2.30 as part of the
"kill-bonobo" effort and has proven itself stable and
On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 13:07 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> Once 3.3 development is underway, one thing I'd like to do is promote
> the EExtension framework in Evolution to libedataserver as a replacement
> for e-data-server-module.c.
On second thought, libebackend might be a better place for EExt
