Re: [Evolution-hackers] Developing a new protected message complement

2014-04-03 Thread Christian Hilberg
Am Mittwoch 02 April 2014, um 19:00:33 schrieb Matthew Barnes: > On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 11:02 -0430, BECERRA Silvana M SIDOR wrote: > [...] > > However, to try to clarify a bit, what we mean by "protected Email" is > > that when reply/forward (inline mode) a "protected message" we're > > allow to w

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Developing a new protected message complement

2014-04-03 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 10:11 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote: > > For that kind of "protection" to have any real meaning, all messages > > should be cryptographically signed by their author and attached in full > > to all replies and forwards. An Evolution extension could conceivably > > enforce tha

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Developing a new protected message complement

2014-04-03 Thread Milan Crha
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 12:13 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > Protected as in legally verifiable [cryptographically signed] or > protected as in keeping a call-center operator from just deleting > everything? Hi, if it's the later, then the "easiest" might be to write an external editor,