Re: [Evolution-hackers] Developing a new protected message complement

2014-04-03 Thread Christian Hilberg
Am Mittwoch 02 April 2014, um 19:00:33 schrieb Matthew Barnes: On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 11:02 -0430, BECERRA Silvana M SIDOR wrote: [...] However, to try to clarify a bit, what we mean by protected Email is that when reply/forward (inline mode) a protected message we're allow to write our

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Developing a new protected message complement

2014-04-03 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 10:11 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote: For that kind of protection to have any real meaning, all messages should be cryptographically signed by their author and attached in full to all replies and forwards. An Evolution extension could conceivably enforce that.

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Developing a new protected message complement

2014-04-03 Thread Milan Crha
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 12:13 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: Protected as in legally verifiable [cryptographically signed] or protected as in keeping a call-center operator from just deleting everything? Hi, if it's the later, then the easiest might be to write an external editor,