Hi Jacky,
I've looked over your patch, but unfortunately it is unusable. The patch
is riddled with buffer overflows and incorrect logic.
What types of bugs are you actually trying to fix? What is it about CJK
messages in particular that are not getting decoded properly? Your email
was overly vagu
>>> Philip Van Hoof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/23/07 5:09 PM >>>
> On Sun, 2007-12-23 at 14:51 -0700, Jeff Stedfast wrote:
> > What types of bugs are you actually trying to fix? What is it about CJK
> > messages in particular that are not getting decoded pr
>>> Peter Volkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/24/07 2:07 AM >>>
> В Пнд, 24/12/2007 в 13:21 +0800, jacky пишет:
> > --- Jeff Stedfast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > There are two kind of email need to support:
> > 1) An encoded-word was divided in
it probably makes more sense to check *inptr first tho I'm not sure if it will
actually make a difference.
Jeff
>>> Philip Van Hoof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/24/07 8:35 AM >>>
While I was merging camel-lite with camel upstream I noticed this one in
camel-mime-utils.c:
@@ -2110,7 +2105,7 @@
