[Evolution-hackers] Evolution 2.91 installation error

2010-11-04 Thread Stefano Facchini
> Hi, >thanks for a message. I tried to fix this in commit fd75cdf in evolution >git master, thus please update your sources and try again. It may work. > Bye, > Milan Thanks to Milan patch the "make" stage was completed successfully! However, the "make install" command still giv

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution 2.91 installation error

2010-11-04 Thread Stefano Facchini
> >        Hi, > hrm, please try update sources again, with commit 9cc43ef. Hmm, no success. Is there anything wrong with what I have done: $ git pull git://git.gnome.org/evolution master $ make clean $ make $ sudo make install then I got the same error. Should I try something like "make instal

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution 2.91 installation error

2010-11-05 Thread Stefano Facchini
>> >> Maybe can this depend on the fact that I have an Evolution 2.30 >> installed from ubuntu repository? >> > > Could well be. I had the same problem and I did a > "LDFLAGS=-L/opt/evo/lib" when I called autogen: > > cd evo-src/evolution >  PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/opt/evo/lib/pkgconfig/  CC='ccache gcc'

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution 2.91 installation error

2010-11-05 Thread Stefano Facchini
> > What are the exact error messages? The error happens during "make install" *only* and is the following: [...] Making install in importers make[3]: ingresso nella directory «/home/stefano/src/evolution/mail/importers» make[4]: ingresso nella directory «/home/stefano/src/evolution/mail/importe

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution 2.91 installation error

2010-11-05 Thread Stefano Facchini
Ok I finally succeeded in installing evolution! as suggested by thomas, installing in /opt/evo solved the "make install", probably I had garbage in my /usr/local. Thank you! ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your l

[Evolution-hackers] Building against gtk3

2010-12-07 Thread Stefano Facchini
Hi, I have the latest version of gnome-shell 2.91 running and I'd like to build evolution 2.91 against the gtk3 library. Is there any instruction to do this? I hope this would solve the issue I have with the window showing the list of emails. As soon as evolution starts, it works well, but after a

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Building against gtk3

2010-12-07 Thread Stefano Facchini
Ok, then I'll file a bug about this issue in the email list window. Il giorno mar, 07/12/2010 alle 12.54 +0100, Rodrigo Moya ha scritto: > On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 11:17 +0100, Stefano Facchini wrote: > > Hi, > > I have the latest version of gnome-shell 2.91 running and I

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Building against gtk3

2010-12-07 Thread Stefano Facchini
BTW how can I compile the gtk3 branch? I have already cloned evolution, evolution-data-server and gtkhtml git repositories. What I have to do now? Il giorno mar, 07/12/2010 alle 12.54 +0100, Rodrigo Moya ha scritto: > On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 11:17 +0100, Stefano Facchini wrote: > > Hi, &

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Building against gtk3

2010-12-07 Thread Stefano Facchini
> Evolution does not yet build against the latest round of API breaks in > gtk3. The others may or may not. Ok, maybe I'll wait until everything is fixed :) > No need to file bugs (unless you're > submitting patches) -- we're well aware of it. > I didn't mean that I wanted to file bugs about co

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Building against gtk3

2010-12-14 Thread Stefano Facchini
Il giorno mar, 14/12/2010 alle 04.47 -0700, Vibha Yadav ha scritto: > Evolution is now compilable against gtk3. Please checkout the gtk3 branch for > + gtkhtml > + evolution-data-server > + evolution > > Also checkout the tracker bug for gtk3 compatibility issues. > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show

[Evolution-hackers] gtkimageview required version

2011-01-28 Thread Stefano Facchini
Hi, I'm trying to build Evolution from git. The configuration phase fails because I lack gtkimageview 2.0: [...] checking for GTKIMAGEVIEW... no configure: error: gtkimageview >= 2.0 is required for the image-inline plugin. Use --disable-image-inline to exclude the plugin. But I can't find