Hi all,
First off, a quick into for those who haven't already met me in IRC:
I'm consulting with the IT department of a large corporation who are
evaluating evolution-mapi as a basis for a native linux mail client
for use in large scale deployment. In the past month or two I've been
hanging ou
Hi David,
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 11:33:22AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Once this passes muster, I'll push these patches (probably *without* the
> NTLM bits, if you're looking closely at what I included) to the
> gnome-2-32 branches and perhaps start doing a 'final call' for 2.32.3
> candidat
Hi David,
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 01:07:38PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Personally, no. I'd rather ignore MAPI completely and get on with the
> implementation of evolution-ews.
Understandable, though as we've discussed on IRC we don't really have
the option of using that here, at least for a
Hi David,
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 09:08:28AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> You're more than welcome to use git.infradead.org if you want. But even
> if Milan sees the 2.32 branch as being dead and doesn't want to spend
> any of his own time on it (and nobody can blame him for that), I would
> ho
Hi Everyone,
I spoke with chen on IRC this morning and got hinted at a preliminary
implementation of EBookBackendSqliteDB sitting in -ews. Since there
are some benefits of something something like this make it's way to
a common place that could be used by -mapi as well, I thought I'd do
a quick f
Hi!
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 11:20:45AM +0530, Chenthill wrote:
> > * No backend _get_contact/_get_contacts equivalent. Should be
> >easily implemented.
> _get_vcard_string ==> _get_contact, i have not added an API return
> EContact to let the callers decide whether they want to parse the str
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 12:23:01PM +0530, Chenthill wrote:
> > Be sure that parsing bdata is a pain, and always will,
> > especially when you already are in a database world, where are tables
> > and relations between them pretty common and nature.
> This is the reason I was thinking whether it wou
Hi Milan,
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 08:56:10AM +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> > As I already said seanus on irc, I will be evaluating the performance
> > between having vcards as files Vs having it in db and then choose the
> > one which would be best. So the code for both will be there and we can
> > c
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 03:44:08PM +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> I tried the LD_PRELOAD=libeatmydata.so workaround suggested in the mail
> above and it does avoid the problem.
If eatmydata removes the bottleneck, then it's likely that either (a)
each operation is corresponding to an fsync/fsyncdata
