On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 16:14 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote:
Hi there,
reading about the new IMAPX implementation used by Evo =2.30, I found it
stated that
Maybe if imapx had come up before, many backends such as groupwise, mapi
etc. would have followed this design rather than a sync
Hi there,
reading about the new IMAPX implementation used by Evo =2.30, I found it
stated that
Maybe if imapx had come up before, many backends such as groupwise, mapi
etc. would have followed this design rather than a sync one.
-- Chenthill in [1]
Does this mean
