Le samedi 06 octobre 2007 à 00:46 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit :
> Nice discussion guys. Lets go this way then.
>
> - Sync ChangeLogs with commit logs
> - "Why instead of what" in ChangeLogs
>
> It is just that I never saw a reason for myself and If people see a
> value out of i
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 00:46 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> Nice discussion guys. Lets go this way then.
>
> - Sync ChangeLogs with commit logs
> - "Why instead of what" in ChangeLogs
>
Awesome!! This would also (incredibly) reduce the effort in generating
the NEWS files too.
ahoj,
though srini has already done a good(TM) decision on this, my two cents:
Am Freitag, den 05.10.2007, 10:38 +0200 schrieb Frederic Crozat:
> Second, being self-contained (and therefore, ease of use for external
> maintainers / lurkers / packagers / release-team). You are only thinking
> of s
Nice discussion guys. Lets go this way then.
- Sync ChangeLogs with commit logs
- "Why instead of what" in ChangeLogs
It is just that I never saw a reason for myself and If people see a
value out of it, lets help them then.
-Srini.
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 10:16 -0400, Matthew Bar
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 10:38 +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> Second, being self-contained (and therefore, ease of use for external
> maintainers / lurkers / packagers / release-team). You are only thinking
> of svn log when using viewcvs. But if you are, just like me, subscribed
> to svn-commit mail
Le vendredi 05 octobre 2007 à 13:36 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit :
> Oh, I remember a thread on d-d-l where there was discussion on two
> ChangeLogs (one part of tree and other part of svn logs). Btw, I'm one
> of those who use those short logs for svn commits and I know a few
> people who cop
When we began to make Evolution patches 5 years ago, we were required to
make the commit changlog the same as the one in ChangeLog by Evolution
maintainers. So we have been doing copy&paste for all the time.
Maybe this has been changed. But I still prefer this old way. This makes
the viewcvs f
Oh, I remember a thread on d-d-l where there was discussion on two
ChangeLogs (one part of tree and other part of svn logs). Btw, I'm one
of those who use those short logs for svn commits and I know a few
people who copy ChangeLogs to svn commit logs.
In anycase, I really dont know/see what is the
Hi everyone,
I'd like to suggest to Evolution hackers, whenever it is possible for
them, to try to improve their svn commit messages.
Some of you are currently using a very short commit message
(something like "fix for bug#xxx), which make reading svn commit
extremely difficult without having to