Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution 2.21.4 , Evolution-Data-Server 2.21.4 , GtkHTML3.17.4 and Evolution-Exchange 2.21.4 released
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 23:00 +0530, Suman wrote: > I see this:'Gtk Doc:no' > However, on opening the Makefile under evolution-data-server, I find > this line: > > DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS = --enable-gtk-doc > > which was why I was concerned .. Is this expected ? Those are custom flags to use when running "make distcheck" since creating a tarball requires that Gtk-Doc is enabled. Check the Makefile.am files under docs/reference for ENABLE_GTK_DOC and then search for the same in acinclude.m4 and you should see how the configure switch works. Matthew Barnes ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution 2.21.4 , Evolution-Data-Server 2.21.4 , GtkHTML3.17.4 and Evolution-Exchange 2.21.4 released
On Dec 19, 2007 10:42 PM, Matthew Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 22:14 +0530, Suman wrote: > > EDS/Evolution does not seem to respect the --disable-gtk-doc configure > > option. (not sure if this is a bug in the configure scripts of > > EDS/Evolution) > > Any thoughts ? > > Works for me with EDS, and Evolution doesn't have that option anymore. > > What do you see in the little summary when configure terminates? > >evolution-data-server has been configured as follows: >... >Gtk Doc: [yes/no] > I see this:'Gtk Doc:no' However, on opening the Makefile under evolution-data-server, I find this line: DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS = --enable-gtk-doc which was why I was concerned .. Is this expected ? > > Matthew Barnes > > -Suman P.S. Sorry for the spam (if you received an incomplete message..) ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution 2.21.4 , Evolution-Data-Server 2.21.4 , GtkHTML3.17.4 and Evolution-Exchange 2.21.4 released
On Dec 19, 2007 10:42 PM, Matthew Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 22:14 +0530, Suman wrote: > > EDS/Evolution does not seem to respect the --disable-gtk-doc configure > > option. (not sure if this is a bug in the configure scripts of > > EDS/Evolution) > > Any thoughts ? > > Works for me with EDS, and Evolution doesn't have that option anymore. > > What do you see in the little summary when configure terminates? > >evolution-data-server has been configured as follows: >... >Gtk Doc: [yes/no] > I see this:'Gtk Doc: no' However > > Matthew Barnes > > ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution 2.21.4 , Evolution-Data-Server 2.21.4 , GtkHTML3.17.4 and Evolution-Exchange 2.21.4 released
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 22:14 +0530, Suman wrote: > EDS/Evolution does not seem to respect the --disable-gtk-doc configure > option. (not sure if this is a bug in the configure scripts of > EDS/Evolution) > Any thoughts ? Works for me with EDS, and Evolution doesn't have that option anymore. What do you see in the little summary when configure terminates? evolution-data-server has been configured as follows: ... Gtk Doc: [yes/no] Matthew Barnes ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution 2.21.4 , Evolution-Data-Server 2.21.4 , GtkHTML3.17.4 and Evolution-Exchange 2.21.4 released
Hi Matt, Srini.. everyone else :) On Dec 19, 2007 2:23 AM, Matthew Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 19:33 +, William Murray wrote: > > Excellent... > >but compiling on Fedora 8 gives: > > which: no gtkdoc-rebase in (/usr/bin:/bin) > > This seems to be to do with gnome version advancement, which is > > what evolution is synced to, so I guess I am lost unless I upgrade more > of gnome? > Yes.. I faced the same problem when I did the tarball-testing. > Upgrade to gtk-doc 1.9 (from Rawhide). > > I've already fixed the E-D-S configure script to require it. > EDS/Evolution does not seem to respect the --disable-gtk-doc configure option. (not sure if this is a bug in the configure scripts of EDS/Evolution) Any thoughts ? > > Matthew Barnes > -Suman ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution 2.21.4 , Evolution-Data-Server 2.21.4 , GtkHTML3.17.4 and Evolution-Exchange 2.21.4 released
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 07:44 +, William Murray wrote: >That works for me. Although the compilation does take around 1Gb > of ram at some point, which brings my machine to a complete standstill. > I'm sure that is new. > Now I can play with this version. Probably the construction of the help documentation. I and several others have witnessed and complained about it too. Looks to be the xml2po tool, though I've not yet investigated whether there's anything we can do to alleviate the huge resource consumption. I've also been thinking about adding a --with-help / --without-help configure option to make it possible to skip that phase for those just building for testing or development purposes. Matthew Barnes ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution 2.21.4 , Evolution-Data-Server 2.21.4 , GtkHTML3.17.4 and Evolution-Exchange 2.21.4 released
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 15:53 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 19:33 +, William Murray wrote: > > Excellent... > >but compiling on Fedora 8 gives: > > which: no gtkdoc-rebase in (/usr/bin:/bin) > > This seems to be to do with gnome version advancement, which is > > what evolution is synced to, so I guess I am lost unless I upgrade more of > > gnome? > > Upgrade to gtk-doc 1.9 (from Rawhide). > > I've already fixed the E-D-S configure script to require it. > > Matthew Barnes Thank you Mathew, That works for me. Although the compilation does take around 1Gb of ram at some point, which brings my machine to a complete standstill. I'm sure that is new. Now I can play with this version. Thanks again, Bill ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution 2.21.4 , Evolution-Data-Server 2.21.4 , GtkHTML3.17.4 and Evolution-Exchange 2.21.4 released
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 15:53 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 19:33 +, William Murray wrote: > > Excellent... > >but compiling on Fedora 8 gives: > > which: no gtkdoc-rebase in (/usr/bin:/bin) > > This seems to be to do with gnome version advancement, which is > > what evolution is synced to, so I guess I am lost unless I upgrade more of > > gnome? > > Upgrade to gtk-doc 1.9 (from Rawhide). > > I've already fixed the E-D-S configure script to require it. > For Gentoo, I fixed the script to not fail if it wasn't there. It looked like an attempt had been made to do that, but there was a bug in it. Daniel ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution 2.21.4 , Evolution-Data-Server 2.21.4 , GtkHTML3.17.4 and Evolution-Exchange 2.21.4 released
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 19:33 +, William Murray wrote: > Excellent... >but compiling on Fedora 8 gives: > which: no gtkdoc-rebase in (/usr/bin:/bin) > This seems to be to do with gnome version advancement, which is > what evolution is synced to, so I guess I am lost unless I upgrade more of > gnome? Upgrade to gtk-doc 1.9 (from Rawhide). I've already fixed the E-D-S configure script to require it. Matthew Barnes ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution 2.21.4 , Evolution-Data-Server 2.21.4 , GtkHTML3.17.4 and Evolution-Exchange 2.21.4 released
Excellent... but compiling on Fedora 8 gives: which: no gtkdoc-rebase in (/usr/bin:/bin) This seems to be to do with gnome version advancement, which is what evolution is synced to, so I guess I am lost unless I upgrade more of gnome? Thank you, Bill ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
