On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 20:00:10 +0100
Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 13:49 -0500, RSV-RR wrote:
running Evolution 3.6.2, and for some reason I am having the following
issues:
- Application doesn't quit cleanly. It hangs and has to be
killed.
On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 14:35 -0500, reid wrote:
found some hints on debugging on Gnome Evo page. Captured this (not
sure how useful it is):
evolution CAMEL_DEBUG=all
No, it should be
CAMEL_DEBUG=all evolution
More information on traces and so on is at:
El día Sunday, February 24, 2013 a las 08:47:34PM +, Pete Biggs escribió:
On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 14:35 -0500, reid wrote:
found some hints on debugging on Gnome Evo page. Captured this (not
sure how useful it is):
evolution CAMEL_DEBUG=all
No, it should be
CAMEL_DEBUG=all
evolution CAMEL_DEBUG=all
No, it should be
CAMEL_DEBUG=all evolution
What would be the diff:
[guru@tiny ~]$ CAMEL_DEBUG=all env | fgrep CAM
CAMEL_DEBUG=all
[guru@tiny ~]$ env CAMEL_DEBUG=all | fgrep CAM
CAMEL_DEBUG=all
What does env do? To quote 'man env':
env -
On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 21:08 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
What would be the diff:
[guru@tiny ~]$ CAMEL_DEBUG=all env | fgrep CAM
CAMEL_DEBUG=all
[guru@tiny ~]$ env CAMEL_DEBUG=all | fgrep CAM
CAMEL_DEBUG=all
As Pete points out, your use of env is misleading you.
Compare these (closer to
Am Donnerstag, den 21.02.2013, 17:23 -0700 schrieb Zan Lynx:
In plain text mode, the Evolution mail composer seems to have a width
limit much smaller than 72 which is where I think it is supposed to be.
This email is probably (I hope) an example of what I mean.
Look at the following line in
On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 16:33 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 21:08 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
What would be the diff:
[guru@tiny ~]$ CAMEL_DEBUG=all env | fgrep CAM
CAMEL_DEBUG=all
[guru@tiny ~]$ env CAMEL_DEBUG=all | fgrep CAM
CAMEL_DEBUG=all
As Pete points out,
On 2/24/2013 3:53 PM, Thomas Prost wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 21.02.2013, 17:23 -0700 schrieb Zan Lynx:
In plain text mode, the Evolution mail composer seems to have a width
limit much smaller than 72 which is where I think it is supposed to be.
This email is probably (I hope) an example of